From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Martin Hicks <mort@bork.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: server mountpoint busy after unexporting nfs4 share
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:27:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130821112700.GD25198@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130821124343.4f5462cc@notabene.brown>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:43:43PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:12:18 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:04:33PM -0400, Martin Hicks wrote:
> > > I'm wondering if I'm missing something or if this is a bug.
> > >
> > > A NFS4 export has active clients. The mount is removed from
> > > /etc/exports and 'exportfs -r' is run. Clients immediately start
> > > getting 'Stale file handle' errors, but the mountpoint is still busy
> > > and cannot be unmounted. Killing off nfsd solves the problem, but is
> > > undesirable for obvious reasons.
> > >
> > > On debian linux, kernel version 3.10-2-amd64, with nfs-utils 1.2.8.
> >
> > Yeah, the clients may hold opens or locks on the filesystem and those
> > don't get removed on exports -r.
> >
> > For now shutting down the server is the only solution.
>
> How far does:
> echo /path/to/export > /proc/fs/nfsd/unlock_filesystem
> get you? Or does that just drop 'lockd' locks and not NFSv4 locks?
Right, it just does lockd locks. It should also do NFSv4 locks, opens,
and delegations. Happy if somebody wants to finish that job off--it
probably wouldn't be too hard? Although there may be a bit of work to
get the error returns right in the v4 case--I think we'd want to keep
the relevant stateid's around and return NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED when a
client continues to use them.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-21 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-15 16:04 server mountpoint busy after unexporting nfs4 share Martin Hicks
2013-08-16 21:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-08-19 15:55 ` Martin Hicks
2013-08-19 18:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-08-20 17:49 ` Martin Hicks
2013-08-21 2:43 ` NeilBrown
2013-08-21 11:27 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-08-22 13:44 ` Martin Hicks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130821112700.GD25198@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mort@bork.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).