From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: gss_destroy crash
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:41:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130917214115.GA3079@fieldses.org> (raw)
As of eb6dc19d8e72ce3a957af5511d20c0db0a8bd007 "RPCSEC_GSS: Share all
credential caches on a per-transport basis" I'm getting an occasional
crash on shutdown of nfsd's 4.0 callback client (see appended oops),
because rpc_shutdown_client() is called on a client whose cl_auth is a
gss_auth with gss_pipe[0]->clnt pointing to freed memory.
Is there any known bug here?
While I try to understand this....
I'm wondering what guarantees that gss_pipe[0]->clnt is still good at
this point, and that leads me to be suspicious of the sharing introduced
by this patch--how do we know that a gss_auth can't be shared between
two clients that could disappear in either order?
The chasing of cl_parent pointers in gss_create() suggests that the
auth's pointers back to clients are always supposed to be back to a
common ancestor, but does gss_auth_find_or_add_hashed really guarantee
that the auth will only be shared between clients that are cloned from a
common ancestor?
--b.
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl lockd sunrpc
CPU: 3 PID: 4071 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 3.11.0-rc2-00182-g025145f #1665
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Workqueue: nfsd4_callbacks nfsd4_do_callback_rpc [nfsd]
task: ffff88003e206080 ti: ffff88003c384000 task.ti: ffff88003c384000
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00001f3>] [<ffffffffa00001f3>] rpc_net_ns+0x53/0x70 [sunrpc]
RSP: 0000:ffff88003c385ab8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff88003af9a800 RCX: 0000000000000002
RDX: ffffffffa00001a5 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff81e284e0
RBP: ffff88003c385ad8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000015 R12: ffff88003c990840
R13: ffff88003c990878 R14: ffff88003c385ba8 R15: ffff88003e206080
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88003fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00007fcdf737e000 CR3: 000000003ad2b000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Stack:
ffffffffa00001a5 0000000000000006 0000000000000006 ffff88003af9a800
ffff88003c385b08 ffffffffa00d52a4 ffff88003c385ba8 ffff88003c751bd8
ffff88003c751bc0 ffff88003e113600 ffff88003c385b18 ffffffffa00d530c
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa00001a5>] ? rpc_net_ns+0x5/0x70 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa00d52a4>] __gss_pipe_release+0x54/0x90 [auth_rpcgss]
[<ffffffffa00d530c>] gss_pipe_free+0x2c/0x30 [auth_rpcgss]
[<ffffffffa00d678b>] gss_destroy+0x9b/0xf0 [auth_rpcgss]
[<ffffffffa000de63>] rpcauth_release+0x23/0x30 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa0001e81>] rpc_release_client+0x51/0xb0 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffffa00020d5>] rpc_shutdown_client+0xe5/0x170 [sunrpc]
[<ffffffff81098a14>] ? cpuacct_charge+0xa4/0xb0
[<ffffffff81098975>] ? cpuacct_charge+0x5/0xb0
[<ffffffffa019556f>] nfsd4_process_cb_update.isra.17+0x2f/0x210 [nfsd]
[<ffffffff819a4ac0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
[<ffffffff819a4acb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x3b/0x60
[<ffffffff810703ab>] ? process_one_work+0x15b/0x510
[<ffffffffa01957dd>] nfsd4_do_callback_rpc+0x8d/0xa0 [nfsd]
[<ffffffff8107041e>] process_one_work+0x1ce/0x510
[<ffffffff810703ab>] ? process_one_work+0x15b/0x510
[<ffffffff810712ab>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x370
[<ffffffff81071190>] ? manage_workers.isra.24+0x2b0/0x2b0
[<ffffffff8107854b>] kthread+0xdb/0xe0
[<ffffffff819a4ac0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60
[<ffffffff81078470>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
[<ffffffff819ac7dc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81078470>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
Code: a5 01 00 a0 31 d2 31 f6 48 c7 c7 e0 84 e2 81 e8 f4 91 0a e1 48 8b 43 60 48 c7 c2 a5 01 00 a0 be 01 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 e0 84 e2 81 <48> 8b 98 10 07 00 00 e8 91 8f 0a e1 e8 3c 4e 07 e1 48 83 c4 18
RIP [<ffffffffa00001f3>] rpc_net_ns+0x53/0x70 [sunrpc]
RSP <ffff88003c385ab8>
---[ end trace ce5e3f2a85c100c0 ]---
next reply other threads:[~2013-09-17 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-17 21:41 J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-09-17 22:19 ` gss_destroy crash J. Bruce Fields
2013-09-18 15:16 ` [PATCH] RPCSEC_GSS: fix crash on destroying gss auth J. Bruce Fields
2013-09-18 15:21 ` Myklebust, Trond
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130917214115.GA3079@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond@netapp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).