Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] NFSD: Implement SEEK

["J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>]

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 02:54:15PM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> On 11/12/2013 02:45 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 02:04:05PM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> >> These patches implement just the SEEK NFS v4.2 operation.  WRITE_PLUS is
> >> still under discussion with the IETF after my last series of patches, so I
> >> am holding off on resubmitting until after spec discussion dies down.
> >>
> >> Questions?  Comments?  Thoughts?
> >> Anna
> >>
> >> Anna Schumaker (3):
> >>   NFSD: Update error codes
> > 
> > I don't think I got this first patch.
> 
> It's in the "patches" directory I used, but I don't see it in my gmail inbox either.  I'll send it out in a minute.
> 
> > 
> >>   NFSD: Create nfs v4.2 decode ops
> >>   NFSD: Implement SEEK
> > 
> > I'd like to be reassured the protocol is reasonably stable before we
> > commit this.  I haven't been following the ietf wg discussion closely.
> > 
> > And this should initially be disabled by default.  So, probably either:
> > 
> > 	- Introduce a new NFSD_V4_SEEK option, or
> > 	- Combine this and NFSD_V4_SECURITY_LABEL and this into a single
> > 	  NFSD_V4_2 option.
> > 
> > And recommend "N" for now.
> > 
> > Probably the latter I guess, to be consistent with the client.  And
> > because otherwise we could end up with an awful lot of config options.
> 
> Sure, I can do that easily enough.

OK.  In that case, you'll probably want to do an additional patch at the
beginning just to replace NFSD_V4_SECURITY_LABEL by NFSD_V4_2.  Note
it's not a pure search-and-replace since the latter covers a little more
code.

The only thing that worries me a bit is the features may mature at
different times.  I guess when the time comes we could split it into
NFSD_V4_2 and NFSD_V4_2_EXPERIMENTAL and recommend distros and
non-developers turn on only the former?

--b.