linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: trond.myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	neilb@suse.de, chuck.lever@oracle.com, steved@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sunrpc/nfs: more reliable detection of running gssd
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:35:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131114153535.0cfec0c3@tlielax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131114192601.GC21152@fieldses.org>

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:26:01 -0500
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:30:50AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > v2:
> > - change name of toplevel pipefs dir from "dummy" to "gssd" (per
> >   Trond's suggestion)
> > 
> > - when gssd isn't running, don't bother to upcall (per Neil B.'s
> >   suggestion)
> > 
> > - fix lifecycle of rpc_pipe data. Previously it would have leaked
> >   after umount. With this set, it's created and destroyed along with
> >   the netns, and just attached to the pipe inode on mount/unmount
> >   of rpc_pipefs.
> > 
> > - patch has been added to skip attempting setclientid with krb5i
> >   if gssd isn't running. This avoids the "AUTH_GSS upcall timed out"
> >   message when gssd isn't running and you mount with sec=sys. It also
> >   shortens the delay when gssd isn't up.
> > 
> > The original cover letter from the v1 posting follows. Note that this
> > set does address the warnings about the AUTH_GSS upcall timing out.
> > 
> > -------------------------[snip]-----------------------------
> > 
> > We've gotten a lot of complaints recently about the 15s delay when
> > doing a sec=sys mount without gssd running.
> > 
> > A large part of the problem is that the kernel isn't able to reliably
> > detect when rpc.gssd is running. What we currently have is a
> > gssd_running flag that is initially set to 1. When an upcall times out,
> > that gets set to 0, and subsequent upcalls get a much shorter timeout
> > (1/4s instead of 15s). It's reset back to '1' when a pipe is reopened.
> > 
> > The approach of using a flag like this is pretty inadequate. First, it
> > doesn't eliminate the long delay on the initial upcall attempt. Also,
> > if gssd spontaneously dies, then the flag will still be set to 1 until
> > the next upcall attempt times out. Finally, it currently requires that
> > the pipe be reopened in order to reset the flag back to true.
> > 
> > This patchset replaces that flag with a more reliable mechanism for
> > detecting when gssd is running. When rpc_pipefs is mounted, it creates a
> > new "dummy" pipe that gssd will naturally find and hold open. We'll
> > never send an upcall down this pipe, and writing to it always fails.
> > But, since we can detect when something is holding it open, we can use
> > that to determine whether gssd is running.
> 
> I think this might have been addressed before, I don't remember: does
> the init system currently have a way to wait till gssd has gotten as far
> as scanning pipefs before allowing mounts?
> 
> (To avoid the race where a krb5 mount fails because gssd is still in the
> process of being started.)
> 
> --b.
> 

I don't think it does.

gssd forks (using daemon()) before it does any real work, and then the
parent exits. I imagine it's possible to hit such a race.

Personally, I've never seen it happen in practice, and I have tested
sec=krb5 mounts in /etc/fstab on recent Fedora. That may just be a
matter of timing or of enough stuff running between rpc.gssd and the
mounts being done.

It might not hurt to patch gssd so that the parent delays exiting until
the child starts up and does its initial run in the !fg case...

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2013-11-14 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-13 14:30 [PATCH v2 0/3] sunrpc/nfs: more reliable detection of running gssd Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sunrpc: create a new dummy pipe for gssd to hold open Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sunrpc: replace sunrpc_net->gssd_running flag with a more reliable check Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] nfs: check if gssd is running before attempting to use krb5i auth in SETCLIENTID call Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 14:38   ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-13 14:48     ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-11-13 15:14       ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-13 15:35         ` Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 15:49           ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-11-13 15:57             ` Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 16:09               ` Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 16:10                 ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-13 16:20                   ` Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 17:05                     ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-13 16:12             ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-13 16:57           ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-14 19:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sunrpc/nfs: more reliable detection of running gssd J. Bruce Fields
2013-11-14 20:35   ` Jeff Layton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131114153535.0cfec0c3@tlielax.poochiereds.net \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).