From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: trond.myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
neilb@suse.de, chuck.lever@oracle.com, steved@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sunrpc/nfs: more reliable detection of running gssd
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:26:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131114192601.GC21152@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384353053-30002-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:30:50AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> v2:
> - change name of toplevel pipefs dir from "dummy" to "gssd" (per
> Trond's suggestion)
>
> - when gssd isn't running, don't bother to upcall (per Neil B.'s
> suggestion)
>
> - fix lifecycle of rpc_pipe data. Previously it would have leaked
> after umount. With this set, it's created and destroyed along with
> the netns, and just attached to the pipe inode on mount/unmount
> of rpc_pipefs.
>
> - patch has been added to skip attempting setclientid with krb5i
> if gssd isn't running. This avoids the "AUTH_GSS upcall timed out"
> message when gssd isn't running and you mount with sec=sys. It also
> shortens the delay when gssd isn't up.
>
> The original cover letter from the v1 posting follows. Note that this
> set does address the warnings about the AUTH_GSS upcall timing out.
>
> -------------------------[snip]-----------------------------
>
> We've gotten a lot of complaints recently about the 15s delay when
> doing a sec=sys mount without gssd running.
>
> A large part of the problem is that the kernel isn't able to reliably
> detect when rpc.gssd is running. What we currently have is a
> gssd_running flag that is initially set to 1. When an upcall times out,
> that gets set to 0, and subsequent upcalls get a much shorter timeout
> (1/4s instead of 15s). It's reset back to '1' when a pipe is reopened.
>
> The approach of using a flag like this is pretty inadequate. First, it
> doesn't eliminate the long delay on the initial upcall attempt. Also,
> if gssd spontaneously dies, then the flag will still be set to 1 until
> the next upcall attempt times out. Finally, it currently requires that
> the pipe be reopened in order to reset the flag back to true.
>
> This patchset replaces that flag with a more reliable mechanism for
> detecting when gssd is running. When rpc_pipefs is mounted, it creates a
> new "dummy" pipe that gssd will naturally find and hold open. We'll
> never send an upcall down this pipe, and writing to it always fails.
> But, since we can detect when something is holding it open, we can use
> that to determine whether gssd is running.
I think this might have been addressed before, I don't remember: does
the init system currently have a way to wait till gssd has gotten as far
as scanning pipefs before allowing mounts?
(To avoid the race where a krb5 mount fails because gssd is still in the
process of being started.)
--b.
>
> The current patch just uses this mechanism to replace the gssd_running
> flag with this new mechanism. This shortens the long delay when mounting
> without gssd running, but does not silence these warnings:
>
> RPC: AUTH_GSS upcall timed out.
> Please check user daemon is running.
>
> I'm willing to add a patch to do that, but I'm a little unclear on the
> best way to do so. Those messages are generated by the auth_gss code. We
> probably do want to print them if someone mounted with sec=krb5, but
> suppress them when mounting with sec=sys.
>
> Do we need to somehow pass down that intent to auth_gss? Another idea
> would be to call gssd_running() from the nfs mount code and use that to
> determine whether to try and use krb5 at all...
>
> Discuss!
>
> Jeff Layton (3):
> sunrpc: create a new dummy pipe for gssd to hold open
> sunrpc: replace sunrpc_net->gssd_running flag with a more reliable
> check
> nfs: check if gssd is running before attempting to use krb5i auth in
> SETCLIENTID call
>
> fs/nfs/client.c | 5 +-
> fs/nfs/internal.h | 4 +-
> fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 8 ++-
> include/linux/nfs_xdr.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/sunrpc/auth_gss.h | 10 ++++
> include/linux/sunrpc/rpc_pipe_fs.h | 7 ++-
> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c | 19 +++++--
> net/sunrpc/netns.h | 3 +-
> net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> net/sunrpc/sunrpc_syms.c | 8 ++-
> 10 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-14 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-13 14:30 [PATCH v2 0/3] sunrpc/nfs: more reliable detection of running gssd Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sunrpc: create a new dummy pipe for gssd to hold open Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sunrpc: replace sunrpc_net->gssd_running flag with a more reliable check Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] nfs: check if gssd is running before attempting to use krb5i auth in SETCLIENTID call Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 14:38 ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-13 14:48 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-11-13 15:14 ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-13 15:35 ` Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 15:49 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-11-13 15:57 ` Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 16:09 ` Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 16:10 ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-13 16:20 ` Jeff Layton
2013-11-13 17:05 ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-13 16:12 ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-13 16:57 ` Chuck Lever
2013-11-14 19:26 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-11-14 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sunrpc/nfs: more reliable detection of running gssd Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131114192601.GC21152@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).