linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	gartim@gmail.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: when reusing an existing repcache entry, unhash it first
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:06:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131204170602.GA13308@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131204120616.464e79d8@corrin.poochiereds.net>

On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:06:16PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> That is another tricky question. Currently, we size the number of hash
> buckets based on the max size of the cache. If we allow it to grow
> without bound, then how do we determine how many hash buckets we need?

It won't grow without bound as long as it's trimmed below the size
by both the periodic workqueue and the shrinker.

Of course replacing the hash with an autoscaling data structure would be
useful, but given that 4.1 obsoletes the DRC I'm not sure how much
effort we want to put into it.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-04 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-02 20:26 [PATCH] nfsd: when reusing an existing repcache entry, unhash it first Jeff Layton
2013-12-03 10:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-03 18:21   ` Jeff Layton
2013-12-04  8:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-04 12:54       ` Jeff Layton
2013-12-04 13:09         ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-04 13:31           ` Jeff Layton
2013-12-04 13:40             ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-04 13:45               ` Jeff Layton
2013-12-04 13:54                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-04 14:15                   ` Jeff Layton
2013-12-04 14:25           ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-12-04 17:06             ` Jeff Layton
2013-12-04 17:06               ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2013-12-04 18:43                 ` Jeff Layton
2013-12-03 15:50 ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131204170602.GA13308@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=gartim@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).