linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, vasily.isaenko@oracle.com,
	hch@infradead.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, sprabhu@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: revoking of suid/sgid bits after chown() in a consistent way
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:38:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131212033859.GA5978@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A845C6.2080109@oracle.com>

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 03:00:22PM +0400, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/11/2013 02:16 PM, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
> [cut off]
> >
> >This patch makes NFS to behave like local file systems.
> >
> [cut off]
> 
> This patch allows to run generic/193 without any issues with NFSv3.
> 
> With NFSv4 generic/193 fails (but with the other issues, which
> existed even before the patch).
> 
> generic/193 expects that suid/sgid bits are cleared after the file
> truncation:
> 
> touch file
> chown fsgqa:fsgqa file
> chmod u+s file
> echo 'xyz' > file
> ls -l file
> su fsgqa -c 'echo > file'
> ls -l file
> 
> With ext4 (for example), we have expectable results:
> -rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 4 Dec 11 05:21 file
> -rw-r--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:22 file
> 
> With NFSv3 as well:
> -rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 4 Dec 11 05:24 file
> -rw-r--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:25 file
> 
> But with NFSv4 the bits are not cleared:
> -rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:19 file
> -rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:21 file
> 
> 'echo > file' issues:
> 
> open("file", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666)
> 
> Can it be because of design differences between NFSv3 and NFSv4?

In the v3 case I'd expect the open O_TRUNC to result in a SETATTR rpc,
in the v4 case an OPEN rpc.  Both result in a call to nfsd_setattr,
though I only see nfsd_setattr turning off the SUID/SGID bits in the
chown case.  Are you sure it isn't the subsequent write that clears
those bits?

But looks to me like nfsd_vfs_write (used in both v3 & v4 cases) clears
suid & guid, so I still don't see it.

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-12  3:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-06 11:56 nfs vs xfstests 193 Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 13:20 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-06 18:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 20:44     ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-12-06 20:47       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-12-10 14:43         ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-11 10:16         ` [PATCH] nfsd: revoking of suid/sgid bits after chown() in a consistent way Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-11 11:00           ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-12  3:38             ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-12-12  8:13               ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 11:44               ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-12 16:01           ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131212033859.GA5978@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sprabhu@redhat.com \
    --cc=stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com \
    --cc=vasily.isaenko@oracle.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).