From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, vasily.isaenko@oracle.com,
hch@infradead.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, sprabhu@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: revoking of suid/sgid bits after chown() in a consistent way
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:38:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131212033859.GA5978@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A845C6.2080109@oracle.com>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 03:00:22PM +0400, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/2013 02:16 PM, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
> [cut off]
> >
> >This patch makes NFS to behave like local file systems.
> >
> [cut off]
>
> This patch allows to run generic/193 without any issues with NFSv3.
>
> With NFSv4 generic/193 fails (but with the other issues, which
> existed even before the patch).
>
> generic/193 expects that suid/sgid bits are cleared after the file
> truncation:
>
> touch file
> chown fsgqa:fsgqa file
> chmod u+s file
> echo 'xyz' > file
> ls -l file
> su fsgqa -c 'echo > file'
> ls -l file
>
> With ext4 (for example), we have expectable results:
> -rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 4 Dec 11 05:21 file
> -rw-r--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:22 file
>
> With NFSv3 as well:
> -rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 4 Dec 11 05:24 file
> -rw-r--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:25 file
>
> But with NFSv4 the bits are not cleared:
> -rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:19 file
> -rwSr--r-- 1 fsgqa fsgqa 1 Dec 11 05:21 file
>
> 'echo > file' issues:
>
> open("file", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666)
>
> Can it be because of design differences between NFSv3 and NFSv4?
In the v3 case I'd expect the open O_TRUNC to result in a SETATTR rpc,
in the v4 case an OPEN rpc. Both result in a call to nfsd_setattr,
though I only see nfsd_setattr turning off the SUID/SGID bits in the
chown case. Are you sure it isn't the subsequent write that clears
those bits?
But looks to me like nfsd_vfs_write (used in both v3 & v4 cases) clears
suid & guid, so I still don't see it.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-12 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-06 11:56 nfs vs xfstests 193 Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 13:20 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-06 18:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-06 20:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-12-06 20:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-12-10 14:43 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-11 10:16 ` [PATCH] nfsd: revoking of suid/sgid bits after chown() in a consistent way Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-11 11:00 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-12 3:38 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-12-12 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 11:44 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2013-12-12 16:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131212033859.GA5978@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sprabhu@redhat.com \
--cc=stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com \
--cc=vasily.isaenko@oracle.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).