Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>, Dickson Steve <steved@redhat.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix intr/nointr to match kernel behavior (ignored)
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 10:42:28 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140308104228.4bfcd3d5@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D65A0AA5-ADF9-43AA-871F-69533C8F2DD7@primarydata.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1897 bytes --]

On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 08:13:00 -0500 Trond Myklebust
<trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> wrote:

> 
> On Mar 7, 2014, at 2:59, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu,  6 Mar 2014 17:02:32 -0500 Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu> wrote:
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
> >> ---
> >> utils/mount/nfs.man | 53 ++++++-----------------------------------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/utils/mount/nfs.man b/utils/mount/nfs.man
> >> index ef09a31..2ab369c 100644
> >> --- a/utils/mount/nfs.man
> >> +++ b/utils/mount/nfs.man
> >> @@ -125,6 +125,12 @@ option may mitigate some of the risks of using the
> >> .B soft
> >> option.
> >> .TP 1.5i
> >> +.BR intr " / " nointr
> >> +This option is provided for backward compatibility.
> >> +It is ignored after kernel 2.6.25.
> >> +System calls return EINTR if an in-progress NFS operation is interrupted by
> >> +a signal.
> > 
> > That isn't correct.
> > "A process that is waiting for a reply for an NFS server can be killed
> > by any signal which would normally kill the process.  If a signal would not
> > normally kill the process (i.e. it is caught or ignored) then that signal
> > will not abort and NFS request".
> > 
> > This is really a fairly horrible semantic.  It makes perfect sense from an
> > internal implementation perspective and provides good backwards compatibility
> > and cross-compatibility with other filesystems (where 'read' and 'write'
> > never ever return EINTR), but it is very hard to document clearly.
> > 
> Isn’t the documentation in the signal(7) manpage sufficient? We could simply refer to that…
> 

I would certainly be good if we could delegation the documentation.  But I
couldn't find anything in signal(7) that seemed particularly relevant. Which
bit were you thinking of?

Thanks,
NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-07 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-06 22:02 [PATCH] fix intr/nointr to match kernel behavior (ignored) Jim Rees
2014-03-07  7:59 ` NeilBrown
2014-03-07 13:13   ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-07 23:42     ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-03-07 23:57       ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-08  1:38         ` Jim Rees

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140308104228.4bfcd3d5@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rees@umich.edu \
    --cc=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox