From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: steved@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] SUNRPC: Ensure that call_connect times out correctly
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:25:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140414122518.6a3ca149@ipyr.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395081645-11906-1-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:40:44 -0400
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> wrote:
> When the server is unavailable due to a networking error, etc, we want
> the RPC client to respect the timeout delays when attempting to reconnect.
>
> Fixes: 561ec1603171 (SUNRPC: call_connect_status should recheck bind..)
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/clnt.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> index 0edada973434..f22d3a115fda 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> @@ -1798,10 +1798,6 @@ call_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task)
> trace_rpc_connect_status(task, status);
> task->tk_status = 0;
> switch (status) {
> - /* if soft mounted, test if we've timed out */
> - case -ETIMEDOUT:
> - task->tk_action = call_timeout;
> - return;
> case -ECONNREFUSED:
> case -ECONNRESET:
> case -ECONNABORTED:
> @@ -1812,7 +1808,9 @@ call_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task)
> if (RPC_IS_SOFTCONN(task))
> break;
> case -EAGAIN:
> - task->tk_action = call_bind;
> + case -ETIMEDOUT:
> + /* Check if we've timed out before looping back to call_bind */
> + task->tk_action = call_timeout;
> return;
> case 0:
> clnt->cl_stats->netreconn++;
I believe this patch may have broken the v4.0 callback channel
establishment code in nfsd. I think what's happening is this:
nfsd tries to create a RPC_TASK_SOFTCONN call to probe the cb channel
with a CB_NULL. It queues the connect_worker to the workqueue. That
establishes the socket and then gets a callback from the socket layer
into xs_tcp_state_change for TCP_ESTABLISHED.
That code does:
xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, -EAGAIN);
...that wakes the task up, and sets the tk_status to -EAGAIN, and it
then moves on to call_timeout due to this patch. That code then does
this:
if (RPC_IS_SOFTCONN(task)) {
rpc_exit(task, -ETIMEDOUT);
return;
}
...and the callback ping then fails with an error. Reverting this patch
seems to fix it. I see several ways that we could fix this, but I'm not
clear on the right way. Maybe we shouldn't be waking up the tasks with
-EAGAIN in the TCP_ESTABLISHED case?
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-14 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-17 18:40 [PATCH 1/2] SUNRPC: Ensure that call_connect times out correctly Trond Myklebust
2014-03-17 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] SUNRPC: Ensure that call_bind " Trond Myklebust
2014-03-18 19:02 ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 15:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] SUNRPC: Ensure that call_connect " Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 15:58 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-18 17:24 ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 18:45 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-18 19:00 ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 19:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-19 12:39 ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-19 12:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-19 14:07 ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-19 15:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-19 17:10 ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-19 17:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-19 18:22 ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-19 19:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-20 14:12 ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-20 15:19 ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 18:47 ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 18:48 ` Steve Dickson
2014-04-14 16:25 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-04-14 16:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2014-04-14 17:32 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140414122518.6a3ca149@ipyr.poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).