linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: steved@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] SUNRPC: Ensure that call_connect times out correctly
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:25:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140414122518.6a3ca149@ipyr.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395081645-11906-1-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:40:44 -0400
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> wrote:

> When the server is unavailable due to a networking error, etc, we want
> the RPC client to respect the timeout delays when attempting to reconnect.
> 
> Fixes: 561ec1603171 (SUNRPC: call_connect_status should recheck bind..)
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/clnt.c | 8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> index 0edada973434..f22d3a115fda 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> @@ -1798,10 +1798,6 @@ call_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task)
>  	trace_rpc_connect_status(task, status);
>  	task->tk_status = 0;
>  	switch (status) {
> -		/* if soft mounted, test if we've timed out */
> -	case -ETIMEDOUT:
> -		task->tk_action = call_timeout;
> -		return;
>  	case -ECONNREFUSED:
>  	case -ECONNRESET:
>  	case -ECONNABORTED:
> @@ -1812,7 +1808,9 @@ call_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task)
>  		if (RPC_IS_SOFTCONN(task))
>  			break;
>  	case -EAGAIN:
> -		task->tk_action = call_bind;
> +	case -ETIMEDOUT:
> +		/* Check if we've timed out before looping back to call_bind */
> +		task->tk_action = call_timeout;
>  		return;
>  	case 0:
>  		clnt->cl_stats->netreconn++;

I believe this patch may have broken the v4.0 callback channel
establishment code in nfsd. I think what's happening is this:

nfsd tries to create a RPC_TASK_SOFTCONN call to probe the cb channel
with a CB_NULL. It queues the connect_worker to the workqueue. That
establishes the socket and then gets a callback from the socket layer
into xs_tcp_state_change for TCP_ESTABLISHED.

That code does:

    xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, -EAGAIN);

...that wakes the task up, and sets the tk_status to -EAGAIN, and it
then moves on to call_timeout due to this patch. That code then does
this:

        if (RPC_IS_SOFTCONN(task)) {
                rpc_exit(task, -ETIMEDOUT);
                return;
        }

...and the callback ping then fails with an error. Reverting this patch
seems to fix it. I see several ways that we could fix this, but I'm not
clear on the right way. Maybe we shouldn't be waking up the tasks with
-EAGAIN in the TCP_ESTABLISHED case?

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-14 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-17 18:40 [PATCH 1/2] SUNRPC: Ensure that call_connect times out correctly Trond Myklebust
2014-03-17 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] SUNRPC: Ensure that call_bind " Trond Myklebust
2014-03-18 19:02   ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 15:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] SUNRPC: Ensure that call_connect " Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 15:58   ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-18 17:24     ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 18:45       ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-18 19:00         ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 19:50           ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-19 12:39             ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-19 12:52               ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-19 14:07                 ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-19 15:04                   ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-19 17:10                     ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-19 17:29                       ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-19 18:22                         ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-19 19:41                           ` Trond Myklebust
2014-03-20 14:12                             ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-20 15:19                               ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 18:47       ` Steve Dickson
2014-03-18 18:48 ` Steve Dickson
2014-04-14 16:25 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-04-14 16:57   ` Trond Myklebust
2014-04-14 17:32     ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140414122518.6a3ca149@ipyr.poochiereds.net \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).