From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:48635 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751035AbaEMQqD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2014 12:46:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 18:45:52 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: David Howells Cc: NeilBrown , Oleg Nesterov , Steven Whitehouse , dm-devel@redhat.com, Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , Steve French , "Theodore Ts'o" , Trond Myklebust , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCHED: remove proliferation of wait_on_bit action functions. Message-ID: <20140513164552.GA5226@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20140501123738.3e64b2d2@notabene.brown> <30769.1399997170@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <30769.1399997170@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 05:06:10PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > NeilBrown wrote: > > > The wait_on_bit() call in __fscache_wait_on_invalidate() was ambiguous > > as it specified TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE but used > > fscache_wait_bit_interruptible as an action function. > > As any error return is never checked I assumed that 'uninterruptible' > > was correct. > > Bug. It should be uninterruptible in both places. Thanks David, queued the patch!