From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: don't halt scanning the DRC LRU list when there's an RC_INPROG entry
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:10:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140605151042.GF8362@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401975900-13398-1-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:45:00AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Currently, the DRC cache pruner will stop scanning the list when it
> hits an entry that is RC_INPROG. It's possible however for a call to
> take a *very* long time. In that case, we don't want it to block other
> entries from being pruned if they are expired or we need to trim the
> cache to get back under the limit.
>
> Fix the DRC cache pruner to just ignore RC_INPROG entries.
Makes sense, applying for 3.16. (Doesn't look like stable material.)
--b.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
> index f8f060ffbf4f..6040da8830ff 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
> @@ -224,13 +224,6 @@ hash_refile(struct svc_cacherep *rp)
> hlist_add_head(&rp->c_hash, cache_hash + hash_32(rp->c_xid, maskbits));
> }
>
> -static inline bool
> -nfsd_cache_entry_expired(struct svc_cacherep *rp)
> -{
> - return rp->c_state != RC_INPROG &&
> - time_after(jiffies, rp->c_timestamp + RC_EXPIRE);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Walk the LRU list and prune off entries that are older than RC_EXPIRE.
> * Also prune the oldest ones when the total exceeds the max number of entries.
> @@ -242,8 +235,14 @@ prune_cache_entries(void)
> long freed = 0;
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(rp, tmp, &lru_head, c_lru) {
> - if (!nfsd_cache_entry_expired(rp) &&
> - num_drc_entries <= max_drc_entries)
> + /*
> + * Don't free entries attached to calls that are still
> + * in-progress, but do keep scanning the list.
> + */
> + if (rp->c_state == RC_INPROG)
> + continue;
> + if (num_drc_entries <= max_drc_entries &&
> + time_before(jiffies, rp->c_timestamp + RC_EXPIRE))
> break;
> nfsd_reply_cache_free_locked(rp);
> freed++;
> --
> 1.9.3
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-05 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-05 13:45 [PATCH] nfsd: don't halt scanning the DRC LRU list when there's an RC_INPROG entry Jeff Layton
2014-06-05 15:10 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140605151042.GF8362@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jlayton@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).