From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: swise@ogc.net, Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] svcrdma: Remove extra writeargs sanity check for NFSv2/3
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:43:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140710194349.GD26561@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B89AB7AC-32E1-4944-9287-73958A569A8E@oracle.com>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:07:34PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi Bruce-
>
> On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:49 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:24:57PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:19 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 01:44:35PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>>> The server should comply with RFC 5667,
> >>>
> >>> Where's the relevant language? (I took a quick look but didn't see it.)
> >>
> >> Sorry, I listed the wrong RFC when I wrote the description of bug 246.
> >> It’s actually RFC 5666, section 3.7.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >>> So I think you just want to drop the round-up of len, not the whole
> >>> check.
> >>
> >> I’ll try that, thanks!
>
> Works-as-expected.
>
> > Actually, I'd really rather this get fixed up in the rpc layer. The
> > padding is really required for correct xdr.
>
> How so?
Well, to be spec-lawyerly, rfc 1832 3.9 defines opaque data as including
the zero-padding; a sequence of bytes isn't legal xdr if it just ends
early.
> All of NFSv4 and all other NFSv3 operations work as expected
> without that padding present. There doesn’t seem to be any operational
> dependency on the presence of padding. Help?
I can believe that the code deals with it now, I just wonder if this
check may not be the only case where someone writing xdr code expects
total length to be a multiple of four.
The drc code also depends on the length being right, see
nfsd_cache_csum. I don't know whether that will cause a practical
problem in this case.
(What about the krb5i case?)
> > The fact that RDMA doesn't
> > require those zeroes to be literally transmitted across the network
> > sounds like a transport-level detail that should be hidden from the xdr
> > code.
>
> The best I can think of is adding a false page array entry to the
> xdr_buf if the last incoming page is short by a few bytes.
The padding just gets added to the end of whichever page the write ended
on, and you only use another page if you run out of space, right?
I don't know, if that's a huge pain then I guess we can live with this.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-10 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-10 17:44 [PATCH 0/2] NFS/RDMA server patches for 3.17 Chuck Lever
2014-07-10 17:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] svcrdma: Increase credit limit to 32 Chuck Lever
2014-07-10 17:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] svcrdma: Remove extra writeargs sanity check for NFSv2/3 Chuck Lever
2014-07-10 18:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-10 18:24 ` Chuck Lever
2014-07-10 18:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-10 19:07 ` Chuck Lever
2014-07-10 19:43 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2014-07-10 20:43 ` Chuck Lever
2014-07-11 18:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-10 19:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] NFS/RDMA server patches for 3.17 Steve Wise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140710194349.GD26561@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swise@ogc.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).