Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfsd4_locku / nfs4_free_lock_stateid question
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 05:19:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140713121919.GA6456@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140713080541.30ecbb51@tlielax.poochiereds.net>

On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 08:05:41AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> It is weird, but I don't think it really matters as the filp is only
> really used as a way to get to the inode -- it really doesn't matter
> which struct file we use there. find_any_file will both take a
> reference to and return the file, which is then eventually fput in
> filp_close, so there should be no refcount leak or anything.
> 
> The weirdness all comes from the vfs-layer file locking interfaces,
> many of which take a struct file argument when they really would be
> fine with a struct inode. Maybe one of these days we can get around to
> cleaning that up.

If filesystems get the file passed we should assume that they actually
use it.  In fact AFS does, but it's not NFS exportable at the moment,
and ceph does in a debug printk.  I'd be much happier to waste a pointer
in the lock stateid to avoid this inconsistant interface.  And it would
allow to kill find_any_fileas well..


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-13 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-13 11:00 nfsd4_locku / nfs4_free_lock_stateid question Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-13 12:05 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-13 12:19   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-07-13 13:50     ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-15 12:13     ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-15 14:50       ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-15 15:53         ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-15 16:56         ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140713121919.GA6456@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jeff.layton@primarydata.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox