From: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] nfsd: Fix delegation revocation
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:24:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140718132436.34924fc4@f20.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140718164417.GB8811@fieldses.org>
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:44:17 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:13:30AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Ensure that the delegations cannot be found by the laundromat etc once
> > we add them to the various 'revoke' lists.
>
> So if I understand right, the big mutex protects all of this right now,
> so this is all just moving the unhashing under a finer-grained lock to
> prevent that in-between state being exposed after the big lock's
> dropped. Looks reasonable.
>
> --b.
>
Yes, sorry -- I forgot the obligatory "this is not a problem until the
client_mutex goes away" comment...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index 60ae21abce00..7c5233427c9b 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -650,13 +650,13 @@ hash_delegation_locked(struct nfs4_delegation *dp, struct nfs4_file *fp)
> > list_add(&dp->dl_perclnt, &dp->dl_stid.sc_client->cl_delegations);
> > }
> >
> > -/* Called under the state lock. */
> > static void
> > -unhash_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> > +unhash_delegation_locked(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> > {
> > struct nfs4_file *fp = dp->dl_file;
> >
> > - spin_lock(&state_lock);
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&state_lock);
> > +
> > dp->dl_stid.sc_type = NFS4_CLOSED_DELEG_STID;
> > spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
> > list_del_init(&dp->dl_perclnt);
> > @@ -665,7 +665,6 @@ unhash_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> > spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
> > if (fp)
> > nfs4_put_deleg_lease(fp);
> > - spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > }
> >
> > static void destroy_revoked_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> > @@ -676,7 +675,9 @@ static void destroy_revoked_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> >
> > static void destroy_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> > {
> > - unhash_delegation(dp);
> > + spin_lock(&state_lock);
> > + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> > + spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > nfs4_put_delegation(dp);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -685,11 +686,10 @@ static void revoke_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> > struct nfs4_client *clp = dp->dl_stid.sc_client;
> >
> > if (clp->cl_minorversion == 0)
> > - destroy_delegation(dp);
> > + destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
> > else {
> > - unhash_delegation(dp);
> > dp->dl_stid.sc_type = NFS4_REVOKED_DELEG_STID;
> > - list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &clp->cl_revoked);
> > + list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &clp->cl_revoked);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1447,15 +1447,16 @@ destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
> > spin_lock(&state_lock);
> > while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_delegations)) {
> > dp = list_entry(clp->cl_delegations.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_perclnt);
> > - list_del_init(&dp->dl_perclnt);
> > + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> > /* Ensure that deleg break won't try to requeue it */
> > ++dp->dl_time;
> > - list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > + list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > }
> > spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
> > dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> > - destroy_delegation(dp);
> > + list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
> > + nfs4_put_delegation(dp);
> > }
> > list_splice_init(&clp->cl_revoked, &reaplist);
> > while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
> > @@ -3655,7 +3656,7 @@ nfs4_open_delegation(struct net *net, struct svc_fh *fh,
> > open->op_delegate_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_READ;
> > return;
> > out_free:
> > - destroy_delegation(dp);
> > + nfs4_put_delegation(dp);
> > out_no_deleg:
> > open->op_delegate_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE;
> > if (open->op_claim_type == NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_PREVIOUS &&
> > @@ -3894,7 +3895,8 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > new_timeo = min(new_timeo, t);
> > break;
> > }
> > - list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> > + list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > }
> > spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &reaplist) {
> > @@ -5369,7 +5371,8 @@ static u64 nfsd_find_all_delegations(struct nfs4_client *clp, u64 max,
> > * don't monkey with it now that we are.
> > */
> > ++dp->dl_time;
> > - list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, victims);
> > + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> > + list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, victims);
> > }
> > if (++count == max)
> > break;
> > @@ -5624,12 +5627,14 @@ nfs4_state_shutdown_net(struct net *net)
> > spin_lock(&state_lock);
> > list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &nn->del_recall_lru) {
> > dp = list_entry (pos, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> > - list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> > + list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > }
> > spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &reaplist) {
> > dp = list_entry (pos, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> > - destroy_delegation(dp);
> > + list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
> > + nfs4_put_delegation(dp);
> > }
> >
> > nfsd4_client_tracking_exit(net);
> > --
> > 1.9.3
> >
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-18 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-18 15:13 [PATCH v4 00/10] nfsd: more delegation fixes to prepare for client_mutex removal Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] nfsd: Protect the nfs4_file delegation fields using the fi_lock Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 18:46 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 16:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-18 17:31 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 17:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-18 19:04 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 19:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-18 19:32 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 19:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-21 21:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-21 21:12 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] nfsd: Move the delegation reference counter into the struct nfs4_stid Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] nfsd: simplify stateid allocation and file handling Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] nfsd: Fix delegation revocation Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 16:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-18 17:24 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is protected by clp->cl_lock Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] nfsd: Convert delegation counter to an atomic_long_t type Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] nfsd: drop unused stp arg to alloc_init_deleg Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] nfsd: clean up arguments to nfs4_open_delegation Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] nfsd: clean up nfs4_set_delegation Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 17:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 17:23 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 15:13 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] nfsd: give block_delegation and delegation_blocked its own spinlock Jeff Layton
2014-07-18 17:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-21 7:02 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-21 11:44 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-21 13:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-21 13:23 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-21 20:40 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-21 21:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-21 22:50 ` NeilBrown
2014-07-22 15:00 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140718132436.34924fc4@f20.localdomain \
--to=jeff.layton@primarydata.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).