Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] NFS: nfs4_do_open should add negative results to the dcache.
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:28:28 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140721132828.77f1297e@notabene.brown> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1940 bytes --]



If you have an NFSv4 mounted directory which does not container 'foo'
and:

  ls -l foo
  ssh $server touch foo
  cat foo

then the 'cat' will fail (usually, depending a bit on the various
cache ages).  This is correct as negative looks are cached by default.
However with the same initial conditions:

  cat foo
  ssh $server touch foo
  cat foo

will usually succeed.  This is because an "open" does not add a
negative dentry to the dcache, while a "lookup" does.

This can have negative performance effects.  When "gcc" searches for
an include file, it will try to "open" the file in every director in
the search path.  Without caching of negative "open" results, this
generates much more traffic to the server than it should (or than
NFSv3 does).

The root of the problem is that _nfs4_open_and_get_state() will call
d_add_unique() on a positive result, but not on a negative result.
Compare with nfs_lookup() which calls d_materialise_unique on both
a positive result and on ENOENT.

This patch adds a call d_add() in the ENOENT case for
_nfs4_open_and_get_state() and also calls nfs_set_verifier().

With it, many fewer "open" requests for known-non-existent files are
sent to the server.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 4bf3d97cc5a0..21fa7bddd3cb 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2216,8 +2216,15 @@ static int _nfs4_open_and_get_state(struct nfs4_opendata *opendata,
 	seq = raw_seqcount_begin(&sp->so_reclaim_seqcount);
 
 	ret = _nfs4_proc_open(opendata);
-	if (ret != 0)
+	if (ret != 0) {
+		if (ret == -ENOENT) {
+			d_drop(opendata->dentry);
+			d_add(opendata->dentry, NULL);
+			nfs_set_verifier(opendata->dentry,
+					 nfs_save_change_attribute(opendata->dir->d_inode));
+		}
 		goto out;
+	}
 
 	state = nfs4_opendata_to_nfs4_state(opendata);
 	ret = PTR_ERR(state);

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2014-07-21  3:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140721132828.77f1297e@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox