From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: bump dp->dl_time when unhashing delegation
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:36:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722193626.GQ8438@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140722135206.7dbfbac5@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:52:06PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:45:52 -0400
> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:41:31PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > There's a potential race between a lease break and DELEGRETURN call.
> > >
> > > Suppose a lease break comes in and queues the workqueue job for a
> > > delegation, but it doesn't run just yet. Then, a DELEGRETURN comes in
> > > finds the delegation and calls destroy_delegation on it to unhash it and
> > > put its primary reference.
> > >
> > > Next, the workqueue job runs and queues the delegation back onto the
> > > del_recall_lru list, issues the CB_RECALL and puts the final reference.
> > > With that, the final reference to the delegation is put, but it's still
> > > on the LRU list.
> > >
> > > When we go to unhash a delegation, it's because we intend to get rid of
> > > it soon afterward, so we don't want lease breaks to mess with it once
> > > that occurs. Fix this by bumping the dl_time whenever we unhash a
> > > delegation, to ensure that lease breaks don't monkey with it.
> >
> > Makes sense, thanks. Repeating from IRC: this fixes a regression from
> > 02e1215f9f7 "nfsd: Avoid taking state_lock while holding inode lock in
> > nfsd_break_one_deleg". (In my tree only.)
> >
> > --b.
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > index 72da0d44e66b..a3a828d17563 100644
> > > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > > @@ -660,6 +660,8 @@ unhash_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> > >
> > > spin_lock(&state_lock);
> > > dp->dl_stid.sc_type = NFS4_CLOSED_DELEG_STID;
> > > + /* Ensure that deleg break won't try to requeue it */
> > > + ++dp->dl_time;
> > > spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
> > > list_del_init(&dp->dl_perclnt);
> > > list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
> > > --
> > > 1.9.3
> > >
>
> Sorry, I think I sent you a version with an earlier description. Here's
> the one I meant to send:
Thanks, applying this version.--b.
>
> --------------------[snip]---------------------
>
> [PATCH] nfsd: bump dl_time when unhashing delegation
>
> There's a potential race between a lease break and DELEGRETURN call.
>
> Suppose a lease break comes in and queues the workqueue job for a
> delegation, but it doesn't run just yet. Then, a DELEGRETURN comes in
> finds the delegation and calls destroy_delegation on it to unhash it and
> put its primary reference.
>
> Next, the workqueue job runs and queues the delegation back onto the
> del_recall_lru list, issues the CB_RECALL and puts the final reference.
> With that, the final reference to the delegation is put, but it's still
> on the LRU list.
>
> When we go to unhash a delegation, it's because we intend to get rid of
> it soon afterward, so we don't want lease breaks to mess with it once
> that occurs. Fix this by bumping the dl_time whenever we unhash a
> delegation, to ensure that lease breaks don't monkey with it.
>
> I believe this is a regression due to commit 02e1215f9f7 (nfsd: Avoid
> taking state_lock while holding inode lock in nfsd_break_one_deleg).
> Prior to that, the state_lock was held in the lm_break callback itself,
> and that would have prevented this race.
>
> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 72da0d44e66b..a3a828d17563 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -660,6 +660,8 @@ unhash_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
>
> spin_lock(&state_lock);
> dp->dl_stid.sc_type = NFS4_CLOSED_DELEG_STID;
> + /* Ensure that deleg break won't try to requeue it */
> + ++dp->dl_time;
> spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
> list_del_init(&dp->dl_perclnt);
> list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
> --
> 1.9.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-22 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-22 16:41 [PATCH] nfsd: bump dp->dl_time when unhashing delegation Jeff Layton
2014-07-22 17:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-22 17:52 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-22 19:36 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140722193626.GQ8438@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jeff.layton@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox