From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@primarydata.com,
hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] nfsd: Do not let nfs4_file pin the struct inode
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:16:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722201616.GR8438@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406047784-1578-5-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:49:44PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
>
> Remove the fi_inode field in struct nfs4_file in order to remove the
> possibility of struct nfs4_file pinning the inode when it does not have
> any open state.
>
> Add a field to struct nfs4_ol_stateid, so that the lock stateid
> may continue to check for existing lock state before being released.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
> fs/nfsd/state.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 4c9404500a8e..9b5775f2af57 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static u64 current_sessionid = 1;
> #define CURRENT_STATEID(stateid) (!memcmp((stateid), ¤tstateid, sizeof(stateid_t)))
>
> /* forward declarations */
> -static int check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *filp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner);
> +static int check_for_locks(struct inode *inode, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner);
>
> /* Locking: */
>
> @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ put_nfs4_file(struct nfs4_file *fi)
> if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&fi->fi_ref, &state_lock)) {
> hlist_del(&fi->fi_hash);
> spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> - iput(fi->fi_inode);
> nfsd4_free_file(fi);
> }
> }
> @@ -2845,8 +2844,7 @@ static struct nfs4_file *nfsd4_alloc_file(void)
> }
>
> /* OPEN Share state helper functions */
> -static void nfsd4_init_file(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct inode *ino,
> - struct knfsd_fh *fh)
> +static void nfsd4_init_file(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct knfsd_fh *fh)
> {
> unsigned int hashval = file_hashval(fh);
>
> @@ -2856,8 +2854,6 @@ static void nfsd4_init_file(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct inode *ino,
> spin_lock_init(&fp->fi_lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fp->fi_stateids);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fp->fi_delegations);
> - ihold(ino);
> - fp->fi_inode = ino;
> fh_copy_shallow(&fp->fi_fhandle, fh);
> fp->fi_had_conflict = false;
> fp->fi_lease = NULL;
> @@ -3065,14 +3061,14 @@ find_file(struct knfsd_fh *fh)
> }
>
> static struct nfs4_file *
> -find_or_add_file(struct inode *ino, struct nfs4_file *new, struct knfsd_fh *fh)
> +find_or_add_file(struct nfs4_file *new, struct knfsd_fh *fh)
> {
> struct nfs4_file *fp;
>
> spin_lock(&state_lock);
> fp = find_file_locked(fh);
> if (fp == NULL) {
> - nfsd4_init_file(new, ino, fh);
> + nfsd4_init_file(new, fh);
> fp = new;
> }
> spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> @@ -3716,7 +3712,6 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nf
> struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp = rqstp->rq_resp;
> struct nfs4_client *cl = open->op_openowner->oo_owner.so_client;
> struct nfs4_file *fp = NULL;
> - struct inode *ino = current_fh->fh_dentry->d_inode;
> struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp = NULL;
> struct nfs4_delegation *dp = NULL;
> __be32 status;
> @@ -3726,7 +3721,7 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nf
> * and check for delegations in the process of being recalled.
> * If not found, create the nfs4_file struct
> */
> - fp = find_or_add_file(ino, open->op_file, ¤t_fh->fh_handle);
> + fp = find_or_add_file(open->op_file, ¤t_fh->fh_handle);
> if (fp != open->op_file) {
> status = nfs4_check_deleg(cl, open, &dp);
> if (status)
> @@ -4206,7 +4201,7 @@ nfsd4_free_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
> {
> struct nfs4_lockowner *lo = lockowner(stp->st_stateowner);
>
> - if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, lo))
> + if (check_for_locks(stp->st_inode, lo))
> return nfserr_locks_held;
> release_lockowner_if_empty(lo);
> return nfs_ok;
> @@ -4665,7 +4660,9 @@ alloc_init_lock_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfs4_client *clp, str
> }
>
> static struct nfs4_ol_stateid *
> -alloc_init_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *open_stp)
> +alloc_init_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct nfs4_file *fp,
> + struct inode *inode,
> + struct nfs4_ol_stateid *open_stp)
> {
> struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp;
> struct nfs4_client *clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
> @@ -4677,6 +4674,8 @@ alloc_init_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct nfs4_file *fp, struct
> list_add(&stp->st_perstateowner, &lo->lo_owner.so_stateids);
> stp->st_stateowner = &lo->lo_owner;
> get_nfs4_file(fp);
> + ihold(inode);
Don't we need a corresponding put somewhere? Am I overlooking it?
--b.
> + stp->st_inode = inode;
> stp->st_file = fp;
> stp->st_access_bmap = 0;
> stp->st_deny_bmap = open_stp->st_deny_bmap;
> @@ -4725,6 +4724,7 @@ static __be32 lookup_or_create_lock_state(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, s
> struct nfs4_file *fi = ost->st_file;
> struct nfs4_openowner *oo = openowner(ost->st_stateowner);
> struct nfs4_client *cl = oo->oo_owner.so_client;
> + struct inode *inode = cstate->current_fh.fh_dentry->d_inode;
> struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
> unsigned int strhashval;
> struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(cl->net, nfsd_net_id);
> @@ -4745,7 +4745,7 @@ static __be32 lookup_or_create_lock_state(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, s
>
> *lst = find_lock_stateid(lo, fi);
> if (*lst == NULL) {
> - *lst = alloc_init_lock_stateid(lo, fi, ost);
> + *lst = alloc_init_lock_stateid(lo, fi, inode, ost);
> if (*lst == NULL) {
> release_lockowner_if_empty(lo);
> return nfserr_jukebox;
> @@ -5098,10 +5098,9 @@ out_nfserr:
> * 0: no locks held by lockowner
> */
> static int
> -check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *filp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner)
> +check_for_locks(struct inode *inode, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner)
> {
> struct file_lock **flpp;
> - struct inode *inode = filp->fi_inode;
> int status = 0;
>
> spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> @@ -5160,7 +5159,7 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> lo = lockowner(sop);
> /* see if there are still any locks associated with it */
> list_for_each_entry(stp, &sop->so_stateids, st_perstateowner) {
> - if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, lo))
> + if (check_for_locks(stp->st_inode, lo))
> goto out;
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/state.h b/fs/nfsd/state.h
> index 33cf950b3873..ba711c66561e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/state.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/state.h
> @@ -397,7 +397,6 @@ struct nfs4_file {
> struct file_lock *fi_lease;
> atomic_t fi_delegees;
> struct knfsd_fh fi_fhandle;
> - struct inode *fi_inode;
> bool fi_had_conflict;
> };
>
> @@ -412,6 +411,7 @@ struct nfs4_ol_stateid {
> unsigned char st_access_bmap;
> unsigned char st_deny_bmap;
> struct nfs4_ol_stateid * st_openstp;
> + struct inode * st_inode;
> };
>
> static inline struct nfs4_ol_stateid *openlockstateid(struct nfs4_stid *s)
> --
> 1.9.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-22 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-22 16:49 [PATCH 0/4] nfsd: don't let nfs4_file pin down the inode when it has no open state Jeff Layton
2014-07-22 16:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] nfsd: Store the filehandle with the struct nfs4_file Jeff Layton
2014-07-22 16:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] nfsd: Use the filehandle to look up the struct nfs4_file instead of inode Jeff Layton
2014-07-22 16:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfsd: nfs4_check_fh - make it actually check the filehandle Jeff Layton
2014-07-22 16:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd: Do not let nfs4_file pin the struct inode Jeff Layton
2014-07-22 20:16 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2014-07-22 23:51 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-22 17:51 ` [PATCH 0/4] nfsd: don't let nfs4_file pin down the inode when it has no open state J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-22 17:53 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140722201616.GR8438@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jlayton@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).