From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] nfsd: fully unhash delegations when revoking them
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:53:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140729175341.GA21091@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140729124143.7e3bae67@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:41:43PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:53:31 -0400
> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 07:34:20AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > @@ -698,11 +699,10 @@ static void revoke_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> > > struct nfs4_client *clp = dp->dl_stid.sc_client;
> > >
> > > if (clp->cl_minorversion == 0)
> > > - destroy_delegation(dp);
> > > + destroy_revoked_delegation(dp);
> >
> > I don't understand this one--in the NFSv4.0 case, when is the delegation
> > unhashed?
> >
> > (And, apologies if that's a repeat question. I remember wondering about
> > this before but can't find mail in the archives....)
> >
> > --b.
> >
>
> It's unhashed by the laundromat (or the fault injection code). The
> deltas that change that are later in this patch, but it doesn't have
> much context so it's a little tricky to spot. Here's the relevant code
> chunk from nfs4_laundromat:
>
> ---------------[snip]-----------------
> spin_lock(&state_lock);
> list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &nn->del_recall_lru) {
> dp = list_entry (pos, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> if (net_generic(dp->dl_stid.sc_client->net, nfsd_net_id) != nn)
> continue;
> if (time_after((unsigned long)dp->dl_time, (unsigned long)cutoff)) {
> t = dp->dl_time - cutoff;
> new_timeo = min(new_timeo, t);
> break;
> }
> unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> }
> spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &reaplist) {
> dp = list_entry (pos, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> revoke_delegation(dp);
> }
> ---------------[snip]-----------------
>
> ...so the laundromat walks the nn->del_recall_lru list, unhashes any
> delegation that has expired and gathers them up onto the list. Then, it
> calls revoke_delegation on each outside of the lock.
Got it, thanks.
> As a side note, that net_generic comparison there looks bogus to me.
> How could you ever end up with an entry from a different namespace on
> this list? I left it in for now since it didn't seem relevant (or
> terribly expensive), but I suspect that it can be removed (or turned
> into a WARN or something).
Looks like this was an oversight from e8c69d17d1ef. I'd be fine with
just removing it.
--b.
>
> > > else {
> > > - unhash_delegation(dp);
> > > dp->dl_stid.sc_type = NFS4_REVOKED_DELEG_STID;
> > > - list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &clp->cl_revoked);
> > > + list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &clp->cl_revoked);
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -1458,15 +1458,14 @@ destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
> > > spin_lock(&state_lock);
> > > while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_delegations)) {
> > > dp = list_entry(clp->cl_delegations.next, struct
> > > nfs4_delegation, dl_perclnt);
> > > - list_del_init(&dp->dl_perclnt);
> > > - /* Ensure that deleg break won't try to requeue it
> > > */
> > > - ++dp->dl_time;
> > > - list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > > + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> > > + list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > > }
> > > spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > > while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
> > > dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct
> > > nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> > > - destroy_delegation(dp);
> > > + list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
> > > + nfs4_put_delegation(dp);
> > > }
> > > list_splice_init(&clp->cl_revoked, &reaplist);
> > > while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
> > > @@ -3662,7 +3661,7 @@ nfs4_open_delegation(struct net *net, struct
> > > svc_fh *fh, open->op_delegate_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_READ;
> > > return;
> > > out_free:
> > > - destroy_delegation(dp);
> > > + nfs4_put_delegation(dp);
> > > out_no_deleg:
> > > open->op_delegate_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE;
> > > if (open->op_claim_type == NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_PREVIOUS &&
> > > @@ -3900,7 +3899,8 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > > new_timeo = min(new_timeo, t);
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > - list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > > + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> > > + list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > > }
> > > spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > > list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &reaplist) {
> > > @@ -5382,12 +5382,8 @@ static u64 nfsd_find_all_delegations(struct
> > > nfs4_client *clp, u64 max, if (dp->dl_time != 0)
> > > continue;
> > >
> > > - /*
> > > - * Increment dl_time to ensure that
> > > delegation breaks
> > > - * don't monkey with it now that we are.
> > > - */
> > > - ++dp->dl_time;
> > > - list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, victims);
> > > + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> > > + list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, victims);
> > > }
> > > if (++count == max)
> > > break;
> > > @@ -5642,12 +5638,14 @@ nfs4_state_shutdown_net(struct net *net)
> > > spin_lock(&state_lock);
> > > list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &nn->del_recall_lru) {
> > > dp = list_entry (pos, struct nfs4_delegation,
> > > dl_recall_lru);
> > > - list_move(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > > + unhash_delegation_locked(dp);
> > > + list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > > }
> > > spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> > > list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &reaplist) {
> > > dp = list_entry (pos, struct nfs4_delegation,
> > > dl_recall_lru);
> > > - destroy_delegation(dp);
> > > + list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
> > > + nfs4_put_delegation(dp);
> > > }
> > >
> > > nfsd4_client_tracking_exit(net);
> > > --
> > > 1.9.3
> > >
>
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-29 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-25 11:34 [PATCH v6 0/9] nfsd: more delegation fixes to prepare for client_mutex removal Jeff Layton
2014-07-25 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] nfsd: simplify stateid allocation and file handling Jeff Layton
2014-07-25 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] nfsd: fully unhash delegations when revoking them Jeff Layton
2014-07-29 14:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-07-29 16:41 ` Jeff Layton
2014-07-29 17:53 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2014-07-25 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is protected by clp->cl_lock Jeff Layton
2014-07-25 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] nfsd: Convert delegation counter to an atomic_long_t type Jeff Layton
2014-07-25 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] nfsd: drop unused stp arg to alloc_init_deleg Jeff Layton
2014-07-25 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] nfsd: clean up arguments to nfs4_open_delegation Jeff Layton
2014-07-25 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] nfsd: clean up nfs4_set_delegation Jeff Layton
2014-07-25 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] nfsd: give block_delegation and delegation_blocked its own spinlock Jeff Layton
2014-07-25 11:34 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] nfsd: remove dl_fh field from struct nfs4_delegation Jeff Layton
2014-07-29 18:59 ` [PATCH v6 0/9] nfsd: more delegation fixes to prepare for client_mutex removal J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140729175341.GA21091@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jeff.layton@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).