linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] nfsd: split DRC global spinlock into per-bucket locks
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 07:44:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140804074443.12ed879c@tlielax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407085564-3227-6-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

On Sun,  3 Aug 2014 13:06:03 -0400
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 

nit: There are a number of comments in nfscache.c that refer to the
cache_lock. Those should be updated since this will make them terribly
confusing later.


> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
> index dc909091349b..74603654b7f9 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>  
>  struct nfsd_drc_bucket {
>  	struct list_head lru_head;
> +	spinlock_t cache_lock;
>  };
>  
>  static struct nfsd_drc_bucket	*drc_hashtbl;
> @@ -79,7 +80,6 @@ static struct shrinker nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker = {
>   * A cache entry is "single use" if c_state == RC_INPROG
>   * Otherwise, it when accessing _prev or _next, the lock must be held.
>   */
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cache_lock);
>  static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(cache_cleaner, cache_cleaner_func);
>  
>  /*
> @@ -154,11 +154,11 @@ nfsd_reply_cache_free_locked(struct svc_cacherep *rp)
>  }
>  
>  static void
> -nfsd_reply_cache_free(struct svc_cacherep *rp)
> +nfsd_reply_cache_free(struct nfsd_drc_bucket *b, struct svc_cacherep *rp)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&cache_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&b->cache_lock);
>  	nfsd_reply_cache_free_locked(rp);
> -	spin_unlock(&cache_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&b->cache_lock);
>  }
>  
>  int nfsd_reply_cache_init(void)
> @@ -180,8 +180,10 @@ int nfsd_reply_cache_init(void)
>  	drc_hashtbl = kcalloc(hashsize, sizeof(*drc_hashtbl), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!drc_hashtbl)
>  		goto out_nomem;
> -	for (i = 0; i < hashsize; i++)
> +	for (i = 0; i < hashsize; i++) {
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drc_hashtbl[i].lru_head);
> +		spin_lock_init(&drc_hashtbl[i].cache_lock);
> +	}
>  	drc_hashsize = hashsize;
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -265,9 +267,13 @@ prune_cache_entries(void)
>  	for (i = 0; i < drc_hashsize; i++) {
>  		struct nfsd_drc_bucket *b = &drc_hashtbl[i];
>  
> +		if (list_empty(&b->lru_head))
> +			continue;
> +		spin_lock(&b->cache_lock);
>  		freed += prune_bucket(b);
>  		if (!list_empty(&b->lru_head))
>  			cancel = false;
> +		spin_unlock(&b->cache_lock);
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -282,9 +288,7 @@ prune_cache_entries(void)
>  static void
>  cache_cleaner_func(struct work_struct *unused)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&cache_lock);
>  	prune_cache_entries();
> -	spin_unlock(&cache_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned long
> @@ -296,12 +300,7 @@ nfsd_reply_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
>  static unsigned long
>  nfsd_reply_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
>  {
> -	unsigned long freed;
> -
> -	spin_lock(&cache_lock);
> -	freed = prune_cache_entries();
> -	spin_unlock(&cache_lock);
> -	return freed;
> +	return prune_cache_entries();
>  }
>  /*
>   * Walk an xdr_buf and get a CRC for at most the first RC_CSUMLEN bytes
> @@ -426,14 +425,14 @@ nfsd_cache_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
>  	 * preallocate an entry.
>  	 */
>  	rp = nfsd_reply_cache_alloc();
> -	spin_lock(&cache_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&b->cache_lock);
>  	if (likely(rp)) {
>  		atomic_inc(&num_drc_entries);
>  		drc_mem_usage += sizeof(*rp);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* go ahead and prune the cache */
> -	prune_cache_entries();
> +	prune_bucket(b);
>  
>  	found = nfsd_cache_search(b, rqstp, csum);
>  	if (found) {
> @@ -470,7 +469,7 @@ nfsd_cache_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
>  	}
>  	rp->c_type = RC_NOCACHE;
>   out:
> -	spin_unlock(&cache_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&b->cache_lock);
>  	return rtn;
>  
>  found_entry:
> @@ -548,7 +547,7 @@ nfsd_cache_update(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, int cachetype, __be32 *statp)
>  
>  	/* Don't cache excessive amounts of data and XDR failures */
>  	if (!statp || len > (256 >> 2)) {
> -		nfsd_reply_cache_free(rp);
> +		nfsd_reply_cache_free(b, rp);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -563,23 +562,23 @@ nfsd_cache_update(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, int cachetype, __be32 *statp)
>  		bufsize = len << 2;
>  		cachv->iov_base = kmalloc(bufsize, GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (!cachv->iov_base) {
> -			nfsd_reply_cache_free(rp);
> +			nfsd_reply_cache_free(b, rp);
>  			return;
>  		}
>  		cachv->iov_len = bufsize;
>  		memcpy(cachv->iov_base, statp, bufsize);
>  		break;
>  	case RC_NOCACHE:
> -		nfsd_reply_cache_free(rp);
> +		nfsd_reply_cache_free(b, rp);
>  		return;
>  	}
> -	spin_lock(&cache_lock);
> +	spin_lock(&b->cache_lock);
>  	drc_mem_usage += bufsize;
>  	lru_put_end(b, rp);
>  	rp->c_secure = rqstp->rq_secure;
>  	rp->c_type = cachetype;
>  	rp->c_state = RC_DONE;
> -	spin_unlock(&cache_lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&b->cache_lock);
>  	return;
>  }
>  
> @@ -610,7 +609,6 @@ nfsd_cache_append(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct kvec *data)
>   */
>  static int nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&cache_lock);
>  	seq_printf(m, "max entries:           %u\n", max_drc_entries);
>  	seq_printf(m, "num entries:           %u\n",
>  			atomic_read(&num_drc_entries));
> @@ -622,7 +620,6 @@ static int nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  	seq_printf(m, "payload misses:        %u\n", payload_misses);
>  	seq_printf(m, "longest chain len:     %u\n", longest_chain);
>  	seq_printf(m, "cachesize at longest:  %u\n", longest_chain_cachesize);
> -	spin_unlock(&cache_lock);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  

Other than that, this looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-04 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-03 17:05 [PATCH 0/6] NFS DRC scalability patches Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] nfsd: Clean up drc cache in preparation for global spinlock elimination Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:06   ` [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: convert the lru list into a per-bucket thing Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:06     ` [PATCH 3/6] nfsd: Remove the cache_hash list Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:06       ` [PATCH 4/6] nfsd: convert num_drc_entries to an atomic_t Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:06         ` [PATCH 5/6] nfsd: split DRC global spinlock into per-bucket locks Trond Myklebust
2014-08-03 17:06           ` [PATCH 6/6] nfsd: Reorder nfsd_cache_match to check more powerful discriminators first Trond Myklebust
2014-08-04 11:44           ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-08-04 11:45 ` [PATCH 0/6] NFS DRC scalability patches Jeff Layton
2014-08-05 20:51   ` Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140804074443.12ed879c@tlielax.poochiereds.net \
    --to=jeff.layton@primarydata.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).