Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org,
	cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] locks/nfsd: internal lease API overhaul
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 21:43:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140824214301.61019123@synchrony.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140824161046.GI15908@infradead.org>

On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:10:46 -0700
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> One more wishlist item in addition to the one mentioned in the patches:
> 
>  - add a return value to lm_break so that the lock manager can tell the
>    core code "you can delete this lease right now".  That gets rid of
>    the games with the timeout which require all kinds of race avoidance
>    code in the users.
> 

I'm not sure I understand what you're suggesting here. Isn't it just as
simple to have lm_break call lease_modify to just remove the lease?

> And a big one that doesn't seem easily addressable, but I'll drop it in
> anyway:
> 
>  - calling ->lm_break without i_lock would make everyones life a heck
>    lot easier..
> 

Indeed. I have some ideas for a larger cleanup of the file locking
code. This series is really sort of prep work for that overhaul, and
I'm hoping we'll be able to do something along those lines.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-25  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-23 14:41 [PATCH 00/10] locks/nfsd: internal lease API overhaul Jeff Layton
2014-08-23 14:41 ` [PATCH 01/10] locks: close potential race in lease_get_mtime Jeff Layton
2014-08-24 15:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-25 20:01   ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-08-23 14:41 ` [PATCH 02/10] nfsd: fix potential lease memory leak in nfs4_setlease Jeff Layton
2014-08-24 15:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-23 14:41 ` [PATCH 03/10] locks: generic_delete_lease doesn't need a file_lock at all Jeff Layton
2014-08-24  1:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-24 10:09     ` Jeff Layton
2014-08-23 14:41 ` [PATCH 04/10] locks: clean up vfs_setlease kerneldoc comments Jeff Layton
2014-08-24 15:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-25 20:11     ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-08-23 14:41 ` [PATCH 05/10] nfsd: don't keep a pointer to the lease in nfs4_file Jeff Layton
2014-08-24 15:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-23 14:41 ` [PATCH 06/10] locks: plumb an "aux" pointer into the setlease routines Jeff Layton
2014-08-24  1:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-24 10:08     ` Jeff Layton
2014-08-24 15:54       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-25 20:28   ` J. Bruce Fields
2014-08-26 10:53     ` Jeff Layton
2014-08-23 14:41 ` [PATCH 07/10] locks: define a lm_setup handler for leases Jeff Layton
2014-08-24 15:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-25  1:19     ` Jeff Layton
2014-08-26 13:58       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-23 14:41 ` [PATCH 08/10] locks: move i_lock acquisition into generic_*_lease handlers Jeff Layton
2014-08-24 16:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-24 16:11     ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-31 14:51       ` Jeff Layton
2014-08-25  1:36     ` Jeff Layton
2014-08-23 14:41 ` [PATCH 09/10] locks: move freeing of leases outside of i_lock Jeff Layton
2014-08-24 16:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-25  1:35     ` Jeff Layton
2014-08-23 14:41 ` [PATCH 10/10] locks: update Documentation/filesystems with lease API changes Jeff Layton
2014-08-24 16:10 ` [PATCH 00/10] locks/nfsd: internal lease API overhaul Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-25  1:43   ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2014-08-26 13:59     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140824214301.61019123@synchrony.poochiereds.net \
    --to=jeff.layton@primarydata.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox