Re: [PATCH 00/10] sunrpc: fixes and cleanups for svc creation and thread handling

["J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>]

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:08:57PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:56 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:17:44AM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> >> On 11/19/2014 04:59 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:37:58 -0500
> >> > "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:51:12AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >> >>> Patch #1 in this series is a bugfix, but probably isn't worth sending to
> >> >>> stable. The rest are just cleanups in preparation for some other patches
> >> >>> that I have queued up. Can you consider these for 3.19?
> >> >> Sure, I've read through them, they look fine.
> >> >>
> >> >> When I tried to apply them to my for-3.19 there were rejects due to
> >> >> tracing stuff in include/trace/events/sunrpc.h.  I haven't tried to
> >> >> investigate yet.
> >> >>
> >> >> --b.
> >> >>
> >> > Ahh yeah. These are based on top of the tracepoint patches I sent to
> >> > Trond a couple of weeks ago. I think he's planning to merge those in
> >> > 3.19 too, but I don't think he's done that yet. Anna may have though...
> >>
> >> I have them in a private tree on my laptop that I use for testing.  Want me to push them out somewhere?
> >
> > That'd help me at least test, but we need something more than a
> > temporary testing branch to get ready for the merge window.  Choices
> > include:
> >
> >         - Trond merges them all now, I pull that and apply these on top.
> >         - I merge them instead, or we divide the patches between us
> >           somehow.  Worst case, it's probably even OK if there's a patch
> >           or two that we both apply.
> >
> > In any case we need to get that sorted out now-ish as the merge window's
> > probably starting next week.
> >
> 
> All patches that I plan on merging for the next window were pushed out
> last Friday. Jeff's tracepoint and debugfs patchset should therefore
> be present in my nfs-for-next and linux-next branches on
> git.linux-nfs.org.

OK, great, I'll go take a look at that and figure out what's needed,
thanks.

--b.