Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	linux-nfs list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remove function macros from nfs4_fs.h
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:08:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150106190800.GB28003@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1C602278-4A23-4975-8339-7AFF0606B154@primarydata.com>

On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 03:31:46PM -0500, Weston Andros Adamson wrote:
> These patches look good to me, but have you tested them? ;)
> 
> I mean, does anyone have a server that implements SP4_MACH_CRED to test against?
> When I originally developed this feature, I tested against a hacked nfsd…
> that code was really ugly (not ready for upstreaming), but allowed me to test the client
> feature.
> 
> IRRC the server side is difficult because the server has to keep stateid to credential
> mappings, so when the machine cred was used it could check access against the acting cred. 
> 
> If there aren’t any servers to test this against, maybe we remove this feature? It can always
> be revived once there is a server to test against.

The Linux server should support MACH_CRED as of
57266a6e916e2522ea61758a3ee5576b60156791 "nfsd4: implement minimal
SP4_MACH_CRED".  (Well, plus some later bugfixes.)  But I think anything
since 3.14 should be OK.

That said, I wouldn't be surprised if it has problems.  But please do
test against that and let me know....

--b.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-01-06 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-05 19:17 [PATCH 0/3] Remove function macros from nfs4_fs.h Anna Schumaker
2015-01-05 19:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] nfs: Call nfs4_state_protect() from nfs4_proc_commit_setup() Anna Schumaker
2015-01-05 19:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] nfs: Call nfs4_state_protect_write() from nfs4_proc_write_setup() Anna Schumaker
2015-01-05 19:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfs: Remove unused v4 macros Anna Schumaker
2015-01-05 20:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] Remove function macros from nfs4_fs.h Weston Andros Adamson
2015-01-05 21:06   ` Anna Schumaker
2015-01-05 21:51     ` Weston Andros Adamson
2015-01-06 15:02       ` Weston Andros Adamson
2015-01-06 19:08   ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2015-01-07 18:47     ` Weston Andros Adamson
2015-01-07 18:55       ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-01-07 18:57         ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150106190800.GB28003@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@primarydata.com \
    --cc=dros@primarydata.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox