From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] NFSD: fix cannot umounting mount points under pseudo root
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 14:19:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150505141957.2aef920e@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55483EB7.5060104@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3744 bytes --]
On Tue, 05 May 2015 11:53:27 +0800 Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cc Steve, Viro,
>
> On 5/1/2015 5:36 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 07:52:25AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:19:34 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Maybe drop the locking from nfsd_buffered_readdir and *just* take the
> >>> i_mutex around lookup_one_len(), if that's the only place we need it?
>
> As description in other thread, before the upcall to rpc.mountd,
> nfsd have call lookup_one_len() for the file, but why rpc.mountd
> also blocked in lookup ?
>
> There is a bug in rpc.mountd when checking sub-directory,
> it sets bad patch length for child.
>
> If parent if "/nfs/xfs" and child is "/nfs/test", the child name
> will be truncated to "/nfs/tes" for strlen(parent), "/nfs/test"
> have exist in kernel's cache for the lookup_one_len(), but
> "/nfs/tes" is a bad path, which needs lookup_slow(), so blocked.
Testing for "/nfs/tes" certain seems like a wrong thing to do.
>
> static int is_subdirectory(char *child, char *parent)
> {
> /* Check is child is strictly a subdirectory of
> * parent or a more distant descendant.
> */
> size_t l = strlen(parent);
>
> if (strcmp(parent, "/") == 0 && child[1] != 0)
> return 1;
>
> return (same_path(child, parent, l) && child[l] == '/');
I guess this should be:
child[l] == '/' && same_path(child, parent, l)
That way there would be no risk of truncating anything.
Can you please test if that one-line change removes the problem?
> }
>
> The following path makes a correct path, not a truncated path.
> Have be tested, everything is OK.
>
> thanks,
> Kinglong Mee
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >From 70b9d1d93a24db8a7837998cb7eb0ff4e98480a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 11:47:20 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] mountd: Case-insensitive path length must equal to parent
>
> Commit 6091c0a4c4 (mountd: add support for case-insensitive file names)
> introdues a bug cause mutex race when looking bad path.
I think we should be clear that the mutex race is already present.
I think you are right that there is a bug here which is making it easy to
trigger, but it isn't exactly "causing" the bug.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
> ---
> utils/mountd/cache.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/utils/mountd/cache.c b/utils/mountd/cache.c
> index 7d250f9..9d9a1bb 100644
> --- a/utils/mountd/cache.c
> +++ b/utils/mountd/cache.c
> @@ -468,16 +468,36 @@ fallback:
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static int subdir_len(char *name, int count_slashes)
> +{
> + char *ptr = NULL;
> + int i;
> +
> + ptr = name;
> + for (i = 0; i < count_slashes + 1; i++) {
> + ptr = strchr(ptr, '/');
> + if (NULL == ptr)
> + return strlen(name);
> + ptr++;
> + }
> +
> + return ptr - name;
> +}
> +
> static int is_subdirectory(char *child, char *parent)
> {
> /* Check is child is strictly a subdirectory of
> * parent or a more distant descendant.
> */
> - size_t l = strlen(parent);
> + size_t l = subdir_len(child, count_slashes(parent));
>
> if (strcmp(parent, "/") == 0 && child[1] != 0)
> return 1;
>
> + /* Case-insensitive path length must equal to parent */
> + if (l != strlen(parent))
> + return 0;
> +
> return (same_path(child, parent, l) && child[l] == '/');
> }
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-21 14:50 [PATCH RFC] NFSD: fix cannot umounting mount points under pseudo root Kinglong Mee
2015-04-21 21:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-04-22 5:07 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-22 11:11 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-22 15:07 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-04-22 23:44 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-23 12:52 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-24 3:00 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-27 12:11 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-29 2:57 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-29 8:45 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-04-29 19:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-04-29 21:52 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-30 21:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-01 1:53 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-01 2:03 ` Al Viro
2015-05-01 2:23 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-01 2:29 ` Al Viro
2015-05-01 3:08 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-01 13:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-02 23:16 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-03 0:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-04 4:11 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-04 21:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 22:27 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-04 22:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 13:54 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-05-05 14:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 15:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 22:26 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-08 16:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-08 20:01 ` [PATCH] nfsd: don't hold i_mutex over userspace upcalls J. Bruce Fields
2015-06-03 15:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-07-05 11:27 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-07-06 18:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-08-18 19:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-11-12 21:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-07 15:31 ` [PATCH RFC] NFSD: fix cannot umounting mount points under pseudo root J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-07 22:42 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-08 14:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-05-05 3:53 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-05-05 4:19 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-05-05 8:32 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-05-05 13:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-06-26 23:14 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-06-26 23:35 ` NeilBrown
2015-07-02 9:42 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-05-01 1:55 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150505141957.2aef920e@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=kinglongmee@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).