public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Dauchy <william@gandi.net>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
Cc: William Dauchy <william@gandi.net>,
	Linux NFS mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	jloup@gandi.net
Subject: Re: extra reference to fl->fl_file, possible regression
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:36:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150710113657.GJ15144@gandi.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150710072438.08b3417a@tlielax.poochiereds.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 702 bytes --]

On Jul10 07:24, Jeff Layton wrote:
> These patches are pretty straightforward. We're just taking an extra
> reference to the filp when running lock operations so that it doesn't
> disappear before the replies can be processed (typically in the event
> that a signal comes in while waiting on the reply). Given the odd stack
> trace above, I have to wonder if there's some sort of memory scribble
> going on.

I was also surprised by such new behavior looking at the impact of those
patches.

> Just to be clear...you are mounting with NFSv4 and running something on
> the mount when you see this, right? If you don't use NFSv4, then is
> everything fine?

yes, it's nfv4.
-- 
William

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-10 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-10  9:29 extra reference to fl->fl_file, possible regression William Dauchy
2015-07-10 11:24 ` Jeff Layton
2015-07-10 11:36   ` William Dauchy [this message]
2015-07-10 12:54   ` William Dauchy
2015-07-10 14:39     ` Jeff Layton
2015-07-10 15:06       ` William Dauchy
2015-07-10 15:18         ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150710113657.GJ15144@gandi.net \
    --to=william@gandi.net \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=jloup@gandi.net \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox