From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, kinglongmee@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/20] locks/nfsd: create a new notifier chain for lease attempts
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:39:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150826183949.0338b296@synchrony.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150826194923.GB4161@fieldses.org>
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:49:23 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 07:17:06AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > With the new file caching infrastructure in nfsd, we can end up holding
> > files open for an indefinite period of time, even when they are still
> > idle. This may prevent the kernel from handing out leases on the file,
> > which we don't really want to block.
> >
> > Fix this by running a blocking notifier call chain whenever on any
> > lease attempt. nfsd can then purge the cache for that inode before
> > returning.
>
> Could this be expensive? There's potentially a lease attempt on every
> NFSv4 open.
>
That's the reason for the FL_LEASE check. nfsd never sets an FL_LEASE
-- only FL_DELEG and FL_LAYOUT. So nfsd will call into the notifier
callback but it'll never do anything.
We'll take a rwsem (which is icky, granted), call into the notifier and
then return immediately once we see it's not FL_LEASE. We could (in
principle) only call the notifier for FL_LEASE calls, but that seems a
little like a layering violation. Maybe it's worthwhile to consider
though.
> Could we use the cache to decide whether a delegation's a good idea?
> (So, skip requesting the delegation if the cache gives evidence of
> recent activity on the file that would have conflicted with the
> delegation we're about to grant.) That might avoid unnecessary cache
> purges too.
>
That's not a bad idea either. I'd have to think about that...
> --b.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
> > ---
> > fs/locks.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> > index d3d558ba4da7..c81b96159e5c 100644
> > --- a/fs/locks.c
> > +++ b/fs/locks.c
> > @@ -167,6 +167,13 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_LGLOCK(file_lock_lglock);
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hlist_head, file_lock_list);
> >
> > /*
> > + * Some subsystems would like to be notified if someone attempts to set a
> > + * lease on a file. This notifier chain will be called whenever this occurs.
> > + */
> > +BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(lease_notifier_chain);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lease_notifier_chain);
> > +
> > +/*
> > * The blocked_hash is used to find POSIX lock loops for deadlock detection.
> > * It is protected by blocked_lock_lock.
> > *
> > @@ -1795,10 +1802,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_setlease);
> > *
> > * The "priv" pointer is passed directly to the lm_setup function as-is. It
> > * may be NULL if the lm_setup operation doesn't require it.
> > + *
> > + * Kernel subsystems can also register to be notified on any attempt to set
> > + * a new lease with the lease_notifier_chain. This is used by (e.g.) nfsd
> > + * to close files that it may have cached when there is an attempt to set a
> > + * conflicting lease.
> > */
> > int
> > vfs_setlease(struct file *filp, long arg, struct file_lock **lease, void **priv)
> > {
> > + if (arg != F_UNLCK)
> > + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&lease_notifier_chain, arg, *lease);
> > +
> > if (filp->f_op->setlease)
> > return filp->f_op->setlease(filp, arg, lease, priv);
> > else
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > index 669e62f6f4f6..77041967d8ff 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
> > @@ -158,6 +158,22 @@ static struct shrinker nfsd_file_shrinker = {
> > .seeks = 1,
> > };
> >
> > +static int
> > +nfsd_file_lease_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long arg,
> > + void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct file_lock *fl = data;
> > +
> > + /* Don't close files if we're the one trying to set the lease */
> > + if (fl->fl_type == FL_LEASE)
> > + nfsd_file_close_inode(file_inode(fl->fl_file));
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct notifier_block nfsd_file_lease_notifier = {
> > + .notifier_call = nfsd_file_lease_notifier_call,
> > +};
> > +
> > int
> > nfsd_file_cache_init(void)
> > {
> > @@ -186,12 +202,21 @@ nfsd_file_cache_init(void)
> > goto out_lru;
> > }
> >
> > + ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&lease_notifier_chain,
> > + &nfsd_file_lease_notifier);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + pr_err("nfsd: unable to register lease notifier: %d\n", ret);
> > + goto out_shrinker;
> > + }
> > +
> > for (i = 0; i < NFSD_FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> > INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&nfsd_file_hashtbl[i].nfb_head);
> > spin_lock_init(&nfsd_file_hashtbl[i].nfb_lock);
> > }
> > out:
> > return ret;
> > +out_shrinker:
> > + unregister_shrinker(&nfsd_file_shrinker);
> > out_lru:
> > list_lru_destroy(&nfsd_file_lru);
> > out_err:
> > @@ -207,6 +232,8 @@ nfsd_file_cache_shutdown(void)
> > struct nfsd_file *nf;
> > LIST_HEAD(dispose);
> >
> > + blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&lease_notifier_chain,
> > + &nfsd_file_lease_notifier);
> > unregister_shrinker(&nfsd_file_shrinker);
> > for (i = 0; i < NFSD_FILE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
> > spin_lock(&nfsd_file_hashtbl[i].nfb_lock);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > index 9a9d314f7b27..01bb82eae684 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -1041,6 +1041,7 @@ extern int fcntl_setlease(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, long arg);
> > extern int fcntl_getlease(struct file *filp);
> >
> > /* fs/locks.c */
> > +extern struct blocking_notifier_head lease_notifier_chain;
> > void locks_free_lock_context(struct file_lock_context *ctx);
> > void locks_free_lock(struct file_lock *fl);
> > extern void locks_init_lock(struct file_lock *);
> > --
> > 2.4.3
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-26 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 11:17 [PATCH v3 00/20] nfsd: open file caching Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/20] nfsd: allow more than one laundry job to run at a time Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/20] nfsd: add a new struct file caching facility to nfsd Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 23:11 ` Peng Tao
2015-08-20 23:43 ` Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/20] list_lru: add list_lru_rotate Jeff Layton
2015-08-21 9:36 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/20] nfsd: add a LRU list for nfsd_files Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/20] nfsd: add a shrinker to the nfsd_file cache Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/20] locks/nfsd: create a new notifier chain for lease attempts Jeff Layton
2015-08-26 19:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-08-26 22:39 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/20] nfsd: hook up nfsd_write to the new nfsd_file cache Jeff Layton
2015-08-26 19:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-08-26 22:40 ` Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/20] nfsd: hook up nfsd_read to the " Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/20] sunrpc: add a new cache_detail operation for when a cache is flushed Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/20] nfsd: handle NFSD_MAY_NOT_BREAK_LEASE in open file cache Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 11/20] nfsd: hook nfsd_commit up to the nfsd_file cache Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 12/20] nfsd: move include of state.h from trace.c to trace.h Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 13/20] nfsd: add new tracepoints for nfsd_file cache Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 14/20] nfsd: close cached files prior to a REMOVE or RENAME that would replace target Jeff Layton
2015-08-26 20:00 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-08-26 22:53 ` Jeff Layton
2015-08-27 13:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-08-28 12:19 ` Jeff Layton
2015-08-28 17:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-08-31 16:50 ` Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 15/20] nfsd: call flush_delayed_fput from nfsd_file_close_fh Jeff Layton
2015-08-21 1:01 ` Peng Tao
2015-08-21 2:18 ` Peng Tao
2015-08-21 11:21 ` Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 16/20] nfsd: convert nfs4_file->fi_fds array to use nfsd_files Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 17/20] nfsd: have nfsd_test_lock use the nfsd_file cache Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 18/20] nfsd: convert fi_deleg_file and ls_file fields to nfsd_file Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 19/20] nfsd: hook up nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op to the nfsd_file cache Jeff Layton
2015-08-21 1:28 ` Peng Tao
2015-08-21 11:23 ` Jeff Layton
2015-08-20 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 20/20] nfsd: rip out the raparms cache Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150826183949.0338b296@synchrony.poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kinglongmee@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).