From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] svcrdma: Do not send XDR roundup bytes for a write chunk
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:24:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151130222433.13029.13424.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151130222141.13029.98664.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net>
Minor optimization: when dealing with write chunk XDR roundup, do
not post a Write WR for the zero bytes in the pad. Simply update
the write segment in the RPC-over-RDMA header to reflect the extra
pad bytes.
The Reply chunk is also a write chunk, but the server does not use
send_write_chunks() to send the Reply chunk. That's OK in this case:
the server Upper Layer typically marshals the Reply chunk contents
in a single contiguous buffer, without a separate tail for the XDR
pad.
The comments and the variable naming refer to "chunks" but what is
really meant is "segments." The existing code sends only one
xdr_write_chunk per RPC reply.
The fix assumes this as well. When the XDR pad in the first write
chunk is reached, the assumption is the Write list is complete and
send_write_chunks() returns.
That will remain a valid assumption until the server Upper Layer can
support multiple bulk payload results per RPC.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
index 969a1ab..bad5eaa 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
@@ -342,6 +342,13 @@ static int send_write_chunks(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt,
arg_ch->rs_handle,
arg_ch->rs_offset,
write_len);
+
+ /* Do not send XDR pad bytes */
+ if (chunk_no && write_len < 4) {
+ chunk_no++;
+ break;
+ }
+
chunk_off = 0;
while (write_len) {
ret = send_write(xprt, rqstp,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-30 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-30 22:24 [PATCH v2 0/8] NFS/RDMA server patches for 4.5 Chuck Lever
2015-11-30 22:24 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2015-11-30 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] svcrdma: Add svc_rdma_get_context() API that is allowed to fail Chuck Lever
2015-11-30 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] svcrdma: Define maximum number of backchannel requests Chuck Lever
2015-11-30 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] svcrdma: Add infrastructure to send backwards direction RPC/RDMA calls Chuck Lever
2015-11-30 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] svcrdma: Add infrastructure to receive backwards direction RPC/RDMA replies Chuck Lever
2015-11-30 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] xprtrdma: Add class for RDMA backwards direction transport Chuck Lever
2015-12-01 13:38 ` Tom Talpey
2015-12-01 14:36 ` Chuck Lever
2015-11-30 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] svcrdma: No need to count WRs in svc_rdma_send() Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151130222433.13029.13424.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox