From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: bfields@fieldses.org
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 9/9] svcrdma: Simplify the check for backward direction replies
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 10:53:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160504145355.6602.64946.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160504144730.6602.89073.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net>
Clean up: rq_arg.head[0] already points to the RPC header. No need
to walk down the RPC-over-RDMA header again.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c | 31 ++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
index c984b0a..f30a43b 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
@@ -549,35 +549,24 @@ static void rdma_read_complete(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
rqstp->rq_arg.buflen = head->arg.buflen;
}
-/* By convention, backchannel calls arrive via rdma_msg type
- * messages, and never populate the chunk lists. This makes
- * the RPC/RDMA header small and fixed in size, so it is
- * straightforward to check the RPC header's direction field.
+/* Currently, this implementation does not support chunks in the
+ * backward direction. Thus only RDMA_MSG bc replies are accepted.
*/
static bool
-svc_rdma_is_backchannel_reply(struct svc_xprt *xprt, struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp)
+svc_rdma_is_backchannel_reply(struct svc_xprt *xprt, struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp,
+ struct xdr_buf *msgp)
{
- __be32 *p = (__be32 *)rmsgp;
+ __be32 *p = (__be32 *)msgp->head[0].iov_base;
+ /* Is there a backchannel transport associated with xprt? */
if (!xprt->xpt_bc_xprt)
return false;
-
+ /* Is there an RPC message in the inline buffer? */
if (rmsgp->rm_type != rdma_msg)
return false;
- if (rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[0] != xdr_zero)
- return false;
- if (rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[1] != xdr_zero)
+ /* Is that message a Call or a Reply? */
+ if (p[1] != cpu_to_be32(RPC_REPLY))
return false;
- if (rmsgp->rm_body.rm_chunks[2] != xdr_zero)
- return false;
-
- /* sanity */
- if (p[7] != rmsgp->rm_xid)
- return false;
- /* call direction */
- if (p[8] == cpu_to_be32(RPC_CALL))
- return false;
-
return true;
}
@@ -643,7 +632,7 @@ int svc_rdma_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
goto out_drop;
rqstp->rq_xprt_hlen = ret;
- if (svc_rdma_is_backchannel_reply(xprt, rmsgp)) {
+ if (svc_rdma_is_backchannel_reply(xprt, rmsgp, &rqstp->rq_arg)) {
ret = svc_rdma_handle_bc_reply(xprt->xpt_bc_xprt, rmsgp,
&rqstp->rq_arg);
svc_rdma_put_context(ctxt, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-04 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-04 14:52 [PATCH v2 0/9] NFS/RDMA server patches proposed for v4.7 Chuck Lever
2016-05-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] svcrdma: Support IPv6 with NFS/RDMA Chuck Lever
2016-05-04 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] svcrdma: Do not add XDR padding to xdr_buf page vector Chuck Lever
2016-05-04 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] svcrdma: svc_rdma_put_context() is invoked twice in Send error path Chuck Lever
2016-05-04 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] svcrdma: Remove superfluous line from rdma_read_chunks() Chuck Lever
2016-05-04 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] svcrdma: Post Receives only for forward channel requests Chuck Lever
2016-05-04 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] svcrdma: Drain QP before freeing svcrdma_xprt Chuck Lever
2016-05-04 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] svcrdma: Eliminate code duplication in svc_rdma_recvfrom() Chuck Lever
2016-05-04 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] svcrdma: Generalize svc_rdma_xdr_decode_req() Chuck Lever
2016-05-04 14:53 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2016-05-13 20:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] NFS/RDMA server patches proposed for v4.7 J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160504145355.6602.64946.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).