From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <schumakeranna@gmail.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix backchannel crash due to multipath
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:54:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160613205440.GA20974@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <285640B8-5ACD-4108-BFF6-F9342E857102@primarydata.com>
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:24:06PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
>
> On 6/13/16, 14:21, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
>
> >On March 24 J. Bruce Fields said:
> >> pynfs can crash the nfs server since the new multipath code. The
> >> problem is that pynfs uses the same tcp connection for multiple v4
> >> clients (something the spec explicitly allows). The callback client in
> >> such cases has to share the same rpc_xprt. The new rpc code, when it
> >> creates two callback clients sharing the same rpc_xprt, ends up trying
> >> to keep that rpc_xprt on the lists of two different rpc_xprt_switch's.
> >> The first symptom I see is a list corruption warning.
> >>
> >> So, I'm enforcing the requirement that there be only one backchannel
> >> rpc_xprt_switch per tcp connection by doing as we do in the rpc_xprt
> >> case: keeping a pointer to it in the svc_xprt, and using that when it's
> >> available instead of allocating a new one.
> >
> >> That's a pretty straightforward fix (and I've verified it works), but
> >> doesn't look very elegant. If there's a better solution, I'm all ears.
> >
> >I haven't come up with anything neater, and kind of need the crash
> >fixed. ACK or NACK? I can take it through my tree if it's an ACK.
> >
> >--b.
> >
>
> Ack
Thanks!--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-13 18:21 [PATCH 0/3] fix backchannel crash due to multipath J. Bruce Fields
2016-06-13 19:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-13 20:54 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-24 21:16 J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160613205440.GA20974@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schumakeranna@gmail.com \
--cc=trondmy@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).