From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>,
"Adamson, Andy" <William.Adamson@netapp.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem re-establishing GSS contexts after a server reboot
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 15:34:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160803193405.GA5901@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A1D033F-7611-401D-A9DF-E5806EFF921C@oracle.com>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:14:21PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:06 PM, bfields@fieldses.org wrote:
> > You should be able to use the same context with different services.
> >
> > Apologies, I haven't caught up with the whole discussion above, this one
> > point just jumped out at me. If you're trying to request a whole new
> > gss context just so you can use, e.g., integrity instead of privacy,
> > then something's wrong.
>
> As I understand it, GSS contexts are fungible until they have been
> used. On first use, the context is bound to a particular service.
> Subsequently it cannot be used with another service.
>
> The Solaris server seems to expect that separate GSS contexts are
> needed when the same UID employs different GSS services. If Solaris
> is wrong about this, can you show me RFC language that specifically
> allows it? I can take that back to the Solaris developers.
No, you're right, apologies; from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2203
Although clients can change the security service and QOP used on
a per-request basis, this may not be acceptable to all RPC
services; some RPC services may "lock" the data exchange phase
into using the QOP and service used on the first data exchange
message.
--b.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-03 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-19 14:51 Problem re-establishing GSS contexts after a server reboot Chuck Lever
2016-07-20 9:14 ` Adamson, Andy
2016-07-20 16:56 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-07-21 6:55 ` Chuck Lever
2016-07-21 16:04 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-07-21 17:56 ` Chuck Lever
2016-07-21 19:54 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-07-21 20:46 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-07-21 21:32 ` Chuck Lever
2016-07-25 18:18 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-07-29 16:27 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-07-29 16:38 ` Chuck Lever
2016-07-29 17:07 ` Adamson, Andy
2016-07-29 17:32 ` Adamson, Andy
2016-07-29 22:24 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-08-02 18:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-08-03 18:53 ` Adamson, Andy
2016-08-03 19:56 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-08-03 20:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-08-03 20:11 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2016-08-03 20:18 ` Adamson, Andy
2016-08-03 20:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-08-03 21:12 ` Adamson, Andy
2016-08-03 19:14 ` Chuck Lever
2016-08-03 19:34 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160803193405.GA5901@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=William.Adamson@netapp.com \
--cc=aglo@umich.edu \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox