From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nfsd: Fix race between FREE_STATEID and LOCK
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 23:48:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160808064846.GA2079@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160807185024.11705.10864.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net>
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:53:07PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> When running LTP's nfslock01 test, the Linux client can send a LOCK
> and a FREE_STATEID request at the same time. The LOCK uses the same
> lockowner as the stateid sent in the FREE_STATEID request.
>
> The outcome is:
>
> Frame 115025 C FREE_STATEID stateid 2/A
> Frame 115026 C LOCK offset 672128 len 64
> Frame 115029 R FREE_STATEID NFS4_OK
> Frame 115030 R LOCK stateid 3/A
> Frame 115034 C WRITE stateid 0/A offset 672128 len 64
> Frame 115038 R WRITE NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID
>
> In other words, the server returns stateid A in a successful LOCK
> reply, but it has already released it. Subsequent uses of the
> stateid fail.
>
> To address this, protect the generation check in nfsd4_free_stateid
> with the st_mutex. This should guarantee that only one of two
> outcomes occurs: either LOCK returns a fresh valid stateid, or
> FREE_STATEID returns NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD.
>
> Reported-by: Alexey Kodanev <alexey.kodanev@oracle.com>
> Fix-suggested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index b921123..07dc1aa 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -4911,19 +4911,20 @@ nfsd4_free_stateid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> ret = nfserr_locks_held;
> break;
> case NFS4_LOCK_STID:
> + atomic_inc(&s->sc_count);
> + spin_unlock(&cl->cl_lock);
> + stp = openlockstateid(s);
> + mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
> ret = check_stateid_generation(stateid, &s->sc_stateid, 1);
> if (ret)
> - break;
> - stp = openlockstateid(s);
> + goto out_mutex_unlock;
> ret = nfserr_locks_held;
> if (check_for_locks(stp->st_stid.sc_file,
> lockowner(stp->st_stateowner)))
> - break;
> - WARN_ON(!unhash_lock_stateid(stp));
> - spin_unlock(&cl->cl_lock);
> - nfs4_put_stid(s);
> + goto out_mutex_unlock;
> + release_lock_stateid(stp);
> ret = nfs_ok;
> - goto out;
> + goto out_mutex_unlock;
It would be nice to split the non-trivial cases (at least
NFS4_LOCK_STID and NFS4_REVOKED_DELEG_STID) into separate helpers
here as a follow on patch..
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-08 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-07 18:53 [PATCH v2] nfsd: Fix race between FREE_STATEID and LOCK Chuck Lever
2016-08-07 22:22 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-08 13:19 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-08 16:14 ` Chuck Lever
2016-08-08 18:58 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-08 19:53 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-08-08 20:17 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-08 6:48 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160808064846.GA2079@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox