From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <schumakeranna@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NFSv4.2 umask support
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 16:28:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161029202850.GA23842@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHc6FU5i3aDDNUKLUot9B8hjbiMxFR4nipB3b-ROa9k4a6KhPQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 11:38:43AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:23 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> wrote:
> > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
> >
> > The following patches allow the umask to be ignored in the presence of
> > inheritable NFSv4 ACLs. Otherwise inheritable ACLs can be rendered
> > mostly useless whenever the umask masks out group bits.
> >
> > This solves a problem we've seen complaints about for some time, both
> > upstream and from RHEL users.
> >
> > The new protocol has been discussed in the IETF working group and is
> > documented at:
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-02
> >
> > It's unlikely that we'll discover problems requiring an incompatible
> > change, so I think we should consider this for 4.10.
>
> Nope, these patches don't implement draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-02 yet,
They don't? What did I miss?
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-29 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-28 20:23 [PATCH 0/2] NFSv4.2 umask support J. Bruce Fields
2016-10-28 20:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfs: add support for the umask attribute J. Bruce Fields
2016-10-28 20:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: " J. Bruce Fields
2016-10-28 20:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] NFSv4.2 umask support J. Bruce Fields
2016-10-29 9:38 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-10-29 20:28 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2016-10-29 22:10 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-10-29 22:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] NFSv4.2 mode_umask support Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-10-30 13:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-10-29 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfs: add support for the umask attribute Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-10-29 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: " Andreas Gruenbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161029202850.GA23842@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schumakeranna@gmail.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).