From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com>,
"ebiederm@xmission.com" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"anna.schumaker@netapp.com" <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: Use current_real_cred() when looking up rpc credentials
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:55:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170110145504.GH52661@ubuntu-hedt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161216130609.GA124240@ubuntu-hedt>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 07:06:09AM -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:01:41PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 11:13 -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > > Since 4.8 follow_automount() overrides the credentials with
> > > &init_cred before calling d_automount(). When
> > > rpcauth_lookupcred() is called in this context it is now using
> > > fs[ug]id from the override creds instead of from the user's
> > > creds, which can cause authentication to fail. To fix this, take
> > > the ids from current_real_cred() instead.
> > >
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+
> > > CC: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> > > Fixes: aeaa4a79ff6a ("fs: Call d_automount with the filesystems
> > > creds")
> > > Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> > > ---
> > > net/sunrpc/auth.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth.c b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
> > > index 2bff63a73cf8..e6197b2bda86 100644
> > > --- a/net/sunrpc/auth.c
> > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
> > > @@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ rpcauth_lookupcred(struct rpc_auth *auth, int
> > > flags)
> > > {
> > > struct auth_cred acred;
> > > struct rpc_cred *ret;
> > > - const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
> > > + const struct cred *cred = current_real_cred();
> > >
> > > dprintk("RPC: looking up %s cred\n",
> > > auth->au_ops->au_name);
> >
> > Among other things, this will break the access() syscall.
>
> Okay, I see that now.
>
> > It's completely the wrong level in which to override credentials.
>
> The reason for it is that sget() now has a capability check which will
> fail on automount if current doesn't have CAP_SYS_ADMIN. So what are the
> alternatives? A few ideas:
>
> - Instead of using a completely differnet set of creds, we could copy
> the current creds and raise CAP_SYS_ADMIN. This won't work if
> curreent is in a different user ns however.
>
> - Filesystems could get around the capability check by using
> sget_userns() during automount.
>
> - We could add a mount flag, say MS_AUTOMOUNT, and skip the capability
> check if that is set.
>
> Any opinions or other ideas?
I haven't seen any responses, possibly just got lost in the shuffle
during the holidays (I know it slipped my mind for a while).
Eric, what do you think about the last option above? From what I can see
looking up rpc credentials just isn't going to work with current_cred
overridden as we're doing for automount.
Thanks,
Seth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-10 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-15 17:13 [PATCH] sunrpc: Use current_real_cred() when looking up rpc credentials Seth Forshee
2016-12-15 23:01 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-12-16 13:06 ` Seth Forshee
2017-01-10 14:55 ` Seth Forshee [this message]
2017-01-11 0:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-01-24 15:17 ` Seth Forshee
2017-01-24 22:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-01-24 23:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-01-24 23:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2017-01-24 23:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-01-25 0:14 ` Trond Myklebust
2017-01-25 14:52 ` Seth Forshee
2017-01-25 15:51 ` Trond Myklebust
2017-01-25 16:28 ` Seth Forshee
2017-02-01 6:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-02-01 6:38 ` [REVIEW][PATCH] fs: Better permission checking for submounts Eric W. Biederman
2017-02-01 13:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2017-02-01 13:38 ` Seth Forshee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170110145504.GH52661@ubuntu-hedt \
--to=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox