linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: bfields@fieldses.org, trond.myklebust@primarydata.com
Cc: schumaker.anna@gmail.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce congestion control protocol requirement for NFSv4
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:03:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170223170337.10686-4-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170223170337.10686-1-jlayton@redhat.com>

NFSv4 requires an "IETF approved congestion control transport". In
practical terms, that means that you should not run NFSv4 over UDP. The
server has never enforced that requirement though.

This patchset fixes that by adding a new flag to the svc_version that
states that it requires a congestion-controlled transport, and a new
flag to the svc_xprt that declares that the transport fulfills that
requirement. We then use those flags to enforce the requirement in
svc_process_common.

In practical terms, that means that we set the new xprt flag in TCP and
RDMA transports, and the the new svc_version flag in NFSv4 svc_version
structs.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
---
 fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c      |  2 ++
 fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c         | 13 +++++++------
 include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h |  3 +++
 net/sunrpc/svc.c           | 13 +++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c b/fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c
index e9836f611d9c..fd0284c1dc32 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c
@@ -1084,6 +1084,7 @@ struct svc_version nfs4_callback_version1 = {
 	.vs_xdrsize = NFS4_CALLBACK_XDRSIZE,
 	.vs_dispatch = NULL,
 	.vs_hidden = true,
+	.vs_need_cong_ctrl = true,
 };
 
 struct svc_version nfs4_callback_version4 = {
@@ -1093,4 +1094,5 @@ struct svc_version nfs4_callback_version4 = {
 	.vs_xdrsize = NFS4_CALLBACK_XDRSIZE,
 	.vs_dispatch = NULL,
 	.vs_hidden = true,
+	.vs_need_cong_ctrl = true,
 };
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
index 2b73b37c2b36..f82fcaa2e1d9 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2476,12 +2476,13 @@ static struct svc_procedure		nfsd_procedures4[2] = {
 };
 
 struct svc_version	nfsd_version4 = {
-		.vs_vers	= 4,
-		.vs_nproc	= 2,
-		.vs_proc	= nfsd_procedures4,
-		.vs_dispatch	= nfsd_dispatch,
-		.vs_xdrsize	= NFS4_SVC_XDRSIZE,
-		.vs_rpcb_optnl	= true,
+	.vs_vers		= 4,
+	.vs_nproc		= 2,
+	.vs_proc		= nfsd_procedures4,
+	.vs_dispatch		= nfsd_dispatch,
+	.vs_xdrsize		= NFS4_SVC_XDRSIZE,
+	.vs_rpcb_optnl		= true,
+	.vs_need_cong_ctrl	= true,
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
index 96467c95f02e..65b1c707c40b 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
@@ -406,6 +406,9 @@ struct svc_version {
 	/* Don't care if the rpcbind registration fails */
 	bool			vs_rpcb_optnl;
 
+	/* Only allowed on IETF-approved congestion controlled xprts */
+	bool			vs_need_cong_ctrl;
+
 	/* Override dispatch function (e.g. when caching replies).
 	 * A return value of 0 means drop the request. 
 	 * vs_dispatch == NULL means use default dispatcher.
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
index 85bcdea67a3f..028c91a07950 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
@@ -1169,6 +1169,19 @@ svc_process_common(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct kvec *argv, struct kvec *resv)
 	  !(versp = progp->pg_vers[vers]))
 		goto err_bad_vers;
 
+	/*
+	 * Some protocol versions (namely NFSv4) require "IETF approved
+	 * congestion control protocols". IOW, UDP is not allowed. We mark
+	 * those when setting up the svc_xprt, and verify that for them here.
+	 *
+	 * The spec is not very clear about what error should be returned when
+	 * someone tries to access a server that is listening on UDP for lower
+	 * versions though. RPC_PROG_MISMATCH seems to be the closest fit.
+	 */
+	if (versp->vs_need_cong_ctrl &&
+	    !test_bit(XPT_CONG_CTRL, &rqstp->rq_xprt->xpt_flags))
+		goto err_bad_vers;
+
 	procp = versp->vs_proc + proc;
 	if (proc >= versp->vs_nproc || !procp->pc_func)
 		goto err_bad_proc;
-- 
2.9.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-23 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-23 17:03 [PATCH 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce requirement for congestion control protocols in NFSv4 Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] sunrpc: flag transports as using IETF approved congestion control protocols Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 19:42   ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-23 20:00     ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 20:06       ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-23 20:11         ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-23 20:26           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-02-23 20:33             ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-23 20:55               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-02-24 15:08                 ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-24 17:17                   ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:03                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-02-23 20:32           ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 20:17         ` Chuck Lever
2017-02-23 20:15     ` Chuck Lever
2017-02-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: turn bitfield flags in svc_version into bools Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 17:03 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2017-02-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] sunrpc: don't register UDP port with rpcbind when version needs congestion control Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 17:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce requirement for congestion control protocols in NFSv4 Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce NFSv4 transport requirements Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sunrpc: turn bitfield flags in svc_version into bools Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sunrpc: flag transports as having both reliable and ordered delivery, and congestion control Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce transport requirements for NFSv4 Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sunrpc: don't register UDP port with rpcbind when version needs congestion control Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:38   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce NFSv4 transport requirements Chuck Lever
2017-02-24 18:53     ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 21:23       ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-24 18:53   ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-24 21:22     ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-24 21:25   ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-24 21:34     ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 21:44       ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-27 11:59         ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-27 12:08           ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-27 12:55             ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-27 14:20               ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170223170337.10686-4-jlayton@redhat.com \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schumaker.anna@gmail.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).