From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: bfields@fieldses.org, trond.myklebust@primarydata.com
Cc: schumaker.anna@gmail.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
chuck.lever@oracle.com, tom@talpey.com,
jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce NFSv4 transport requirements
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:25:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170224182525.10390-1-jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170223170337.10686-1-jlayton@redhat.com>
v2: comment clarifications, and commit log cleanup. No functional changes.
RFC5661 says:
NFSv4.1 works over Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) and non-RDMA-
based transports with the following attributes:
o The transport supports reliable delivery of data, which NFSv4.1
requires but neither NFSv4.1 nor RPC has facilities for ensuring
[34].
o The transport delivers data in the order it was sent. Ordered
delivery simplifies detection of transmit errors, and simplifies
the sending of arbitrary sized requests and responses via the
record marking protocol [3].
...and then some hand-wavy stuff about congestion control. RFC7530
doesn't mention needing reliable and ordered delivery, but it does need
congestion control.
In practical terms, that means we should be excluding NFSv4 from UDP
transports. The NFS server has never enforced this requirement,
however, so a user could issue NFSv4 calls against the server via UDP.
This patchset adds a small bit of infrastructure to the sunrpc layer to
enforce this requirement, and has the nfs and nfsd layers set the
appropriate flags for it on their server-side transports. It also has
the rpcbind client skip registering the protocol version on a UDP port
when that flag is set.
Lightly tested by hand, but it's fairly straightforward.
Jeff Layton (4):
sunrpc: turn bitfield flags in svc_version into bools
sunrpc: flag transports as having both reliable and ordered delivery,
and congestion control
nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce transport requirements for NFSv4
sunrpc: don't register UDP port with rpcbind when version needs
congestion control
fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c | 6 ++++--
fs/nfsd/nfs2acl.c | 1 -
fs/nfsd/nfs3acl.c | 1 -
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 13 +++++++------
include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 12 ++++++++----
include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h | 1 +
net/sunrpc/svc.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 1 +
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c | 8 ++++++++
9 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--
2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-24 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-23 17:03 [PATCH 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce requirement for congestion control protocols in NFSv4 Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] sunrpc: flag transports as using IETF approved congestion control protocols Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 19:42 ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-23 20:00 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 20:06 ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-23 20:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-23 20:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-02-23 20:33 ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-23 20:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-02-24 15:08 ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-24 17:17 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-02-23 20:32 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 20:17 ` Chuck Lever
2017-02-23 20:15 ` Chuck Lever
2017-02-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: turn bitfield flags in svc_version into bools Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce congestion control protocol requirement for NFSv4 Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] sunrpc: don't register UDP port with rpcbind when version needs congestion control Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 17:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce requirement for congestion control protocols in NFSv4 Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2017-02-24 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sunrpc: turn bitfield flags in svc_version into bools Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sunrpc: flag transports as having both reliable and ordered delivery, and congestion control Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce transport requirements for NFSv4 Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sunrpc: don't register UDP port with rpcbind when version needs congestion control Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce NFSv4 transport requirements Chuck Lever
2017-02-24 18:53 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 21:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-24 18:53 ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-24 21:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-24 21:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-24 21:34 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 21:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-27 11:59 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-27 12:08 ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-27 12:55 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-27 14:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170224182525.10390-1-jlayton@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schumaker.anna@gmail.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).