From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs: cleanup to hide some details of delegation logic
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:10:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170831211002.GG8223@parsley.fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504122659.2845.1.camel@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:50:59PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> ACK, I like that better too. I think a kerneldoc header is probably
> warranted here too, since this is a bit of an odd return situation.
Am I overdoing it?:
--b.
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 6421feeda4bd..2261728cc900 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2285,6 +2285,25 @@ static inline int break_deleg(struct inode *inode, void *who, unsigned int mode)
#define DELEG_NO_WAIT ((struct inode *)1)
+/**
+ * try_break_deleg - initiate a delegation break
+ * @inode: inode to break the delegation on
+ * @deleg_break_ctl: delegation state; see below
+ *
+ * VFS operations that are incompatible with a delegation call this to
+ * break any delegations on the inode first. The caller must first lock
+ * the inode to prevent races with processes granting new delegations.
+ *
+ * Delegations may be slow to recall, so we initiate the recall but do
+ * not wait for it here while holding locks. The caller should instead
+ * drop locks and call break_deleg_wait() which will wait for a recall,
+ * if there is one. The inode to wait on will be stored in
+ * deleg_break_ctl, which also tracks who is breaking the delegation in
+ * the NFS case. The caller can then retry the operation (possibly on a
+ * different inode, since a new lookup may have been required after
+ * reacquiring locks.)
+ */
+
static inline int try_break_deleg(struct inode *inode, struct deleg_break_ctl *deleg_break_ctl)
{
int ret;
@@ -2299,6 +2318,22 @@ static inline int try_break_deleg(struct inode *inode, struct deleg_break_ctl *d
return ret;
}
+/**
+ * break_deleg_wait - wait on a delegation recall if necessary
+ * @deleg_break_ctl: delegation state
+ * @error: error to use if there is no delegation to wait on
+ *
+ * This should be called with the deleg_break_ctl previously passed to
+ * try_break_deleg().
+ *
+ * If the previous try_break_deleg() found no delegation in need of
+ * breaking, this is a no-op that just returns the given error.
+ *
+ * Otherwise it will wait for the delegation recall. If the wait is
+ * succesful, it will return a positive value to indicate to the caller
+ * that it should retry the operation that originally prompted the
+ * break.
+ */
static inline int break_deleg_wait(struct deleg_break_ctl *deleg_break_ctl, int error)
{
if (!deleg_break_ctl->delegated_inode)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-31 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-25 21:52 [PATCH 0/3] Eliminate delegation self-conflicts J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-25 21:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs: cleanup to hide some details of delegation logic J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-28 3:54 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-29 21:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-30 19:50 ` Jeff Layton
2017-08-31 21:10 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2017-08-31 23:13 ` Jeff Layton
2017-08-25 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: hide another detail " J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-28 4:43 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-29 21:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-30 0:43 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-30 17:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-30 23:26 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-31 19:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-31 23:27 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-01 16:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-04 4:52 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-05 19:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-05 21:35 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-06 16:03 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-07 0:43 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-08 15:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-16 14:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-25 21:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd: clients don't need to break their own delegations J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-28 4:32 ` NeilBrown
2017-08-29 21:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-03-16 14:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-07 22:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-08 5:06 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-08 15:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-26 18:06 ` [PATCH 0/3] Eliminate delegation self-conflicts Chuck Lever
2017-08-29 21:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-08-29 23:39 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170831211002.GG8223@parsley.fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).