public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: "zhengbin (A)" <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Cc: jlayton@kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	houtao1@huawei.com, zhaohongjiang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Return EPERM on utime/utimes/lutimes calls instead of EACCESS in some cases
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:49:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181205014900.GC6093@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bfa4c769-79dd-79fe-c29f-75507719aec0@huawei.com>

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:43:06AM +0800, zhengbin (A) wrote:
>  second parameter of utime/utimes/lutimes is not NULL   -------> maybe lutimes should be removed? I think "second parameter of utime/utimes is not NULL" would be better

Also fixed, thanks.--b.

> 
> On 2018/12/5 9:37, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:04:22AM +0800, zhengbin (A) wrote:
> >> thanks,
> >>>>> As the man(3) page for utime/utimes/lutimes, EPERM is returned
> >>
> >> -------->this should be As the man page for utime/utimes/lutimes, my little mistake. utime/utimes are man(2), lutimes is man(3)
> >>
> >> I send v2 patch?Or when you apply, help modify it?
> > 
> > Does this look OK?
> > 
> > --b.
> > 
> > commit eb6d67589750
> > Author: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
> > Date:   Fri Nov 30 16:04:25 2018 +0800
> > 
> >     nfsd: Return EPERM, not EACCES, in some SETATTR cases
> >     
> >     As the man(2) page for utime/utimes states, EPERM is returned when the
> >     second parameter of utime/utimes/lutimes is not NULL, the caller's
> >     effective UID does not match the owner of the file, and the caller is
> >     not privileged.
> >     
> >     However, in a NFS directory mounted from knfsd, it will return EACCES
> >     (from nfsd_setattr-> fh_verify->nfsd_permission).  This patch fixes
> >     that.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > index eb67098117b4..9824e32b2f23 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > @@ -396,10 +396,23 @@ nfsd_setattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, struct iattr *iap,
> >  	bool		get_write_count;
> >  	bool		size_change = (iap->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE);
> >  
> > -	if (iap->ia_valid & (ATTR_ATIME | ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_SIZE))
> > +	if (iap->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) {
> >  		accmode |= NFSD_MAY_WRITE|NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE;
> > -	if (iap->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE)
> >  		ftype = S_IFREG;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If utimes(2) and friends are called with times not NULL, we should
> > +	 * not set NFSD_MAY_WRITE bit. Otherwise fh_verify->nfsd_permission
> > +	 * will return EACCESS, when the caller's effective UID does not match
> > +	 * the owner of the file, and the caller is not privileged. In this
> > +	 * situation, we should return EPERM(notify_change will return this).
> > +	 */
> > +	if (iap->ia_valid & (ATTR_ATIME | ATTR_MTIME)) {
> > +		accmode |= NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE;
> > +		if (!(iap->ia_valid & (ATTR_ATIME_SET | ATTR_MTIME_SET)))
> > +			accmode |= NFSD_MAY_WRITE;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	/* Callers that do fh_verify should do the fh_want_write: */
> >  	get_write_count = !fhp->fh_dentry;
> > 
> > .
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-05  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-30  7:51 [PATCH] nfsd: Return EPERM on utime/utimes/lutimes calls instead of EACCESS in some cases zhengbin
2018-12-03  8:36 ` zhengbin (A)
2018-12-04 20:13   ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-12-05  1:04     ` zhengbin (A)
2018-12-05  1:37       ` J. Bruce Fields
2018-12-05  1:43         ` zhengbin (A)
2018-12-05  1:49           ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-30  8:04 zhengbin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181205014900.GC6093@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhaohongjiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengbin13@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox