Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] nfsd: keep a tally of RECLAIM_COMPLETE operations when using nfsdcld

Scott Mayhew
2018-12-19T22:05:48Z

On Wed, 19 Dec 2018, J. Bruce Fields wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:29:26AM -0500, Scott Mayhew wrote:
> > When using nfsdcld for NFSv4 client tracking, track the number of
> > RECLAIM_COMPLETE operations we receive from "known" clients to help in
> > deciding if we can lift the grace period early (or whether we need to
> > start a v4 grace period at all).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/netns.h | 3 +++
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c | 5 +++++
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/netns.h b/fs/nfsd/netns.h
> > index 32cb8c027483..b42aaa22fba2 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/netns.h
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/netns.h
> > @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ struct nfsd_net {
> > time_t nfsd4_grace;
> > bool somebody_reclaimed;
> >
> > + bool track_reclaim_completes;
> > + atomic_t nr_reclaim_complete;
> > +
> > bool nfsd_net_up;
> > bool lockd_up;
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c
> > index 89c2a27956d0..ae74814b2397 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c
> > @@ -1251,6 +1251,7 @@ nfsd4_cld_grace_done(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > free_cld_upcall(cup);
> > out_err:
> > nfs4_release_reclaim(nn);
> > + atomic_set(&nn->nr_reclaim_complete, 0);
> > if (ret)
> > printk(KERN_ERR "NFSD: Unable to end grace period: %d\n", ret);
> > }
> > @@ -1270,6 +1271,8 @@ nfs4_cld_state_init(struct net *net)
> > for (i = 0; i < CLIENT_HASH_SIZE; i++)
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nn->reclaim_str_hashtbl[i]);
> > nn->reclaim_str_hashtbl_size = 0;
> > + nn->track_reclaim_completes = true;
> > + atomic_set(&nn->nr_reclaim_complete, 0);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -1279,6 +1282,7 @@ nfs4_cld_state_shutdown(struct net *net)
> > {
> > struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
> >
> > + nn->track_reclaim_completes = false;
> > kfree(nn->reclaim_str_hashtbl);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1318,6 +1322,7 @@ nfsd4_cld_tracking_exit(struct net *net)
> > struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
> >
> > nfs4_release_reclaim(nn);
> > + atomic_set(&nn->nr_reclaim_complete, 0);
> > nfsd4_remove_cld_pipe(net);
> > nfs4_cld_state_shutdown(net);
> > }
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index 777fbb0d2761..5dfc3cd51d08 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static u64 current_sessionid = 1;
> > /* forward declarations */
> > static bool check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner);
> > static void nfs4_free_ol_stateid(struct nfs4_stid *stid);
> > +void nfsd4_end_grace(struct nfsd_net *nn);
> >
> > /* Locking: */
> >
> > @@ -1988,10 +1989,41 @@ destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
> > __destroy_client(clp);
> > }
> >
> > +static void inc_reclaim_complete(struct nfs4_client *clp)
> > +{
> > + struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(clp->net, nfsd_net_id);
> > +
> > + if (!nn->track_reclaim_completes)
> > + return;
> > + if (!test_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_RECLAIM_COMPLETE, &clp->cl_flags))
> > + return;
>
> Looking at the code.... This test will never fail, will it? We could
> make it a WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(...)) but it doesn't look like a likely
> bug to me.

No, that test should never fail... I think I was being overly cautious.

>
> > + if (!nfsd4_find_reclaim_client(clp->cl_name, nn))
> > + return;
> > + if (atomic_inc_return(&nn->nr_reclaim_complete) ==
> > + nn->reclaim_str_hashtbl_size) {
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: all clients done reclaiming, ending NFSv4 grace period (net %x)\n",
> > + clp->net->ns.inum);
> > + nfsd4_end_grace(nn);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void dec_reclaim_complete(struct nfs4_client *clp)
> > +{
> > + struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(clp->net, nfsd_net_id);
> > +
> > + if (!nn->track_reclaim_completes)
> > + return;
> > + if (!test_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_RECLAIM_COMPLETE, &clp->cl_flags))
> > + return;
> > + if (nfsd4_find_reclaim_client(clp->cl_name, nn))
> > + atomic_dec(&nn->nr_reclaim_complete);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void expire_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
> > {
> > unhash_client(clp);
> > nfsd4_client_record_remove(clp);
> > + dec_reclaim_complete(clp);
> > __destroy_client(clp);
> > }
>
> This doesn't look right to me. If a client reclaims and then
> immediately calls DESTROY_CLIENTID or something--that should still count
> as a reclaim, and that shouldn't prevent us from ending the grace period
> early.
>
> I think dec_reclaim_complete is unnecessary.

What if a client sends a RECLAIM_COMPLETE, then reboots and sends an
EXCHANGE_ID, CREATE_SESSION, and RECLAIM_COMPLETE while the server is
still in grace? The count would be too high then and the server could
exit grace before all the clients have reclaimed. I actually added
that at Jeff's suggestion because he was seeing it with nfs-ganesha.

-Scott
>
> --b.
>
> >
> > @@ -3339,6 +3371,7 @@ nfsd4_reclaim_complete(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
> >
> > status = nfs_ok;
> > nfsd4_client_record_create(cstate->session->se_client);
> > + inc_reclaim_complete(cstate->session->se_client);
> > out:
> > return status;
> > }
> > @@ -4734,6 +4767,10 @@ static bool clients_still_reclaiming(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > unsigned long double_grace_period_end = nn->boot_time +
> > 2 * nn->nfsd4_lease;
> >
> > + if (nn->track_reclaim_completes &&
> > + atomic_read(&nn->nr_reclaim_complete) ==
> > + nn->reclaim_str_hashtbl_size)
> > + return false;
> > if (!nn->somebody_reclaimed)
> > return false;
> > nn->somebody_reclaimed = false;
> > @@ -7253,10 +7290,25 @@ nfs4_state_start_net(struct net *net)
> > return ret;
> > locks_start_grace(net, &nn->nfsd4_manager);
> > nfsd4_client_tracking_init(net);
> > + if (nn->track_reclaim_completes && nn->reclaim_str_hashtbl_size == 0)
> > + goto skip_grace;
> > printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: starting %ld-second grace period (net %x)\n",
> > nn->nfsd4_grace, net->ns.inum);
> > queue_delayed_work(laundry_wq, &nn->laundromat_work, nn->nfsd4_grace * HZ);
> > return 0;
> > +
> > +skip_grace:
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "NFSD: no clients to reclaim, skipping NFSv4 grace period (net %x)\n",
> > + net->ns.inum);
> > + queue_delayed_work(laundry_wq, &nn->laundromat_work, nn->nfsd4_lease * HZ);
> > + /*
> > + * we could call nfsd4_end_grace() here, but it has a dprintk()
> > + * that would be confusing if debug logging is enabled
> > + */
> > + nn->grace_ended = true;
> > + nfsd4_record_grace_done(nn);
> > + locks_end_grace(&nn->nfsd4_manager);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > /* initialization to perform when the nfsd service is started: */
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> > index 6384c9b94898..950ac6683be9 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> > @@ -1240,6 +1240,7 @@ static __net_init int nfsd_init_net(struct net *net)
> > nn->nfsd4_lease = 45; /* default lease time */
> > nn->nfsd4_grace = 45;
> > nn->somebody_reclaimed = false;
> > + nn->track_reclaim_completes = false;
> > nn->clverifier_counter = prandom_u32();
> > nn->clientid_counter = prandom_u32();
> > nn->s2s_cp_cl_id = nn->clientid_counter++;
> > --
> > 2.17.1