Re: [PATCH 4.14 0/2] Two nfsd4 fixes for 4.14 longterm

Greg KH
2019-02-13T14:15:44Z

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 07:49:56AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:59:26PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:34:41PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:59:04PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote:
> > > > On 02/05/19 12:59, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Are you planning to submit the same as well for 4.9 LTS? The two
> > > > > commits apply on top of 4.9.154 with line number updated.
> > > >
> > > > No, I'm not, because I didn't do any testing with 4.9.
> > > >
> > > > Additionally, I'm unsure about the right procedure for trivial backports
> > > > to multiple trees: Individual patch sets, which apply perfectly, a single
> > > > patch sets and Greg resolves that for the other trees or maybe no patch
> > > > set at all and just a "please cherry-pick .... from upstream" mail.
> > >
> > > The first patch in this series applies to 4.9.y, but the second does
> > > not.
> > >
> > > I'll be glad to take a backported, and tested, series, if someone still
> > > cares about NFS for 4.9.y. But unless you really care about that tree,
> > > I would not worry about it.
> >
> > Hmm, both apply on top of 4.9.155, still but with line numbers
> > adjusted (I'm attaching the respective rebased patches). Actually my
> > question on the respective backports was originally triggered due to
> > https://bugs-devel.debian.org/898060
> >
> > The problem actually is on the 'tested' part, as Donald did no
> > testing/reproducing with 4.9 itself.
>
> Attached rebased to apply on top of 4.9.156.

Thanks, both now queued up.

greg k-h