Re: [PATCH] sunrpc/cache: handle missing listeners better.

["J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>]

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 09:32:08AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22 2019, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > I've gotten complaints about the same thing and said "well, in
> > retrospect we shouldn't have designed the interface this way, but we
> > did, so just stop opening those files".
> 
> As the fool who actually "designed" this,

Pretty sure I was there too and had my chance to object.  In any case,
hope you didn't take that as a personal complaint about your work, it
(along with lots of maintenance since then) is much appreciated.

> I can say with some confidence that the intention was always the
> requests would block for at most 30 seconds.
...
> > One advantage of waiting for mountd to come back is that you could
> > upgrade mountd in place.  That shouldn't take 30 seconds, though.  And I
> > haven't heard of anyone actually doing that.
> 
> Surely upgrading of mountd in-place happens whenever you install a new
> version.

I didn't think distros restarted mountd on upgrade, but I haven't
actually checked that.  I agree that it's something we should allow,
anyway.

> > It's too bad that not opening auth.unix.gid is the only way for mountd
> > to communicate that gids shouldn't be mapped.
> 
> I have a general preference for reusing existing functionality rather
> than creating new special-purpose functionality.  I think this has
> served me well more often than not.  Maybe this is one case of "not".
> 
> If you want to restart mountd without --managed-gids (where previously
> it had that option), there is a chance that you will hit this problem.
> That is a case where the answer "just stop opening those files" doesn't
> really apply.

Yeah.  OK, applying.

(But I'm traveling and may not get this tested and pushed out till next
week.)

--b.