From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 004/375] NFS: make nfs_match_client killable
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 15:15:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522192115.22666-4-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522192115.22666-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 950a578c6128c2886e295b9c7ecb0b6b22fcc92b ]
Actually we don't do anything with return value from
nfs_wait_client_init_complete in nfs_match_client, as a
consequence if we get a fatal signal and client is not
fully initialised, we'll loop to "again" label
This has been proven to cause soft lockups on some scenarios
(no-carrier but configured network interfaces)
Signed-off-by: Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/nfs/client.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c
index 90d71fda65cec..350cfa561e0e8 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/client.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/client.c
@@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ static struct nfs_client *nfs_match_client(const struct nfs_client_initdata *dat
struct nfs_client *clp;
const struct sockaddr *sap = data->addr;
struct nfs_net *nn = net_generic(data->net, nfs_net_id);
+ int error;
again:
list_for_each_entry(clp, &nn->nfs_client_list, cl_share_link) {
@@ -296,8 +297,10 @@ static struct nfs_client *nfs_match_client(const struct nfs_client_initdata *dat
if (clp->cl_cons_state > NFS_CS_READY) {
refcount_inc(&clp->cl_count);
spin_unlock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
- nfs_wait_client_init_complete(clp);
+ error = nfs_wait_client_init_complete(clp);
nfs_put_client(clp);
+ if (error < 0)
+ return ERR_PTR(error);
spin_lock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
goto again;
}
@@ -407,6 +410,8 @@ struct nfs_client *nfs_get_client(const struct nfs_client_initdata *cl_init)
clp = nfs_match_client(cl_init);
if (clp) {
spin_unlock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
+ if (IS_ERR(clp))
+ return clp;
if (new)
new->rpc_ops->free_client(new);
return nfs_found_client(cl_init, clp);
--
2.20.1
next parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-22 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190522192115.22666-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-05-22 19:15 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2019-05-23 15:02 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 004/375] NFS: make nfs_match_client killable Benjamin Coddington
2019-05-29 18:46 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190522192115.22666-4-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com \
--cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rbergant@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).