public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Frank van der Linden <fllinden@amazon.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, bfields@fieldses.org,
	chuck.lever@oracle.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] nfsd: define xattr functions to call in to their vfs counterparts
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 15:37:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202003121557.ixk2m2K3%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200311195954.27117-7-fllinden@amazon.com>

Hi Frank,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on nfsd/nfsd-next]
[also build test WARNING on nfs/linux-next linus/master v5.6-rc5 next-20200311]
[cannot apply to cel/for-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Frank-van-der-Linden/server-side-user-xattr-support-RFC-8276/20200312-064928
base:   git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git nfsd-next
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.1-174-g094d5a94-dirty
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__'

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2102:13: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@    expected int err @@    got restricted __int err @@
>> fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2102:13: sparse:    expected int err
>> fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2102:13: sparse:    got restricted __be32
>> fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2104:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@    expected restricted __be32 @@    got be32 @@
>> fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2104:24: sparse:    expected restricted __be32
>> fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2104:24: sparse:    got int err
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2108:21: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@    expected int err @@    got restricted __int err @@
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2108:21: sparse:    expected int err
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2108:21: sparse:    got restricted __be32
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2112:16: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@    expected restricted __be32 @@    got be32 @@
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2112:16: sparse:    expected restricted __be32
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2112:16: sparse:    got int err
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2121:13: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@    expected int err @@    got restricted __int err @@
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2121:13: sparse:    expected int err
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2121:13: sparse:    got restricted __be32
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2123:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@    expected restricted __be32 @@    got be32 @@
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2123:24: sparse:    expected restricted __be32
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2123:24: sparse:    got int err
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2128:21: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@    expected int err @@    got restricted __int err @@
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2128:21: sparse:    expected int err
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2128:21: sparse:    got restricted __be32
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2132:16: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@    expected restricted __be32 @@    got be32 @@
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2132:16: sparse:    expected restricted __be32
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2132:16: sparse:    got int err
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2148:13: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@    expected int err @@    got restricted __int err @@
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2148:13: sparse:    expected int err
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2148:13: sparse:    got restricted __be32
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2150:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@    expected restricted __be32 @@    got be32 @@
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2150:24: sparse:    expected restricted __be32
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2150:24: sparse:    got int err
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2172:13: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@    expected int err @@    got restricted __int err @@
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2172:13: sparse:    expected int err
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2172:13: sparse:    got restricted __be32
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2174:24: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in return expression (different base types) @@    expected restricted __be32 @@    got be32 @@
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2174:24: sparse:    expected restricted __be32
   fs/nfsd/vfs.c:2174:24: sparse:    got int err

vim +2102 fs/nfsd/vfs.c

  2094	
  2095	__be32
  2096	nfsd_getxattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, char *name,
  2097		      void *buf, int *lenp)
  2098	{
  2099		ssize_t lerr;
  2100		int err;
  2101	
> 2102		err = fh_verify(rqstp, fhp, 0, NFSD_MAY_READ);
  2103		if (err)
> 2104			return err;
  2105	
  2106		lerr = vfs_getxattr(fhp->fh_dentry, name, buf, *lenp);
  2107		if (lerr < 0)
  2108			err = nfsd_xattr_errno(lerr);
  2109		else
  2110			*lenp = lerr;
  2111	
  2112		return err;
  2113	}
  2114	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-12  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-11 19:59 [PATCH 00/14] server side user xattr support (RFC 8276) Frank van der Linden
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 01/14] nfs,nfsd: NFSv4.2 extended attribute protocol definitions Frank van der Linden
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 02/14] xattr: modify vfs_{set,remove}xattr for NFS server use Frank van der Linden
2020-03-12 16:23   ` Chuck Lever
2020-03-13 15:35   ` J. Bruce Fields
2020-03-13 16:07     ` [PATCH 02/14] xattr: modify vfs_{set, remove}xattr " Frank van der Linden
2020-03-13 21:06       ` J. Bruce Fields
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 03/14] nfsd: split off the write decode code in to a separate function Frank van der Linden
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 04/14] nfsd: make sure the nfsd4_ops array has the right size Frank van der Linden
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 05/14] nfsd: add defines for NFSv4.2 extended attribute support Frank van der Linden
2020-03-12 16:23   ` Chuck Lever
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 06/14] nfsd: define xattr functions to call in to their vfs counterparts Frank van der Linden
2020-03-12  7:37   ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2020-03-12 16:23   ` Chuck Lever
2020-03-12 17:16     ` Frank van der Linden
2020-03-12 17:57       ` Chuck Lever
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 07/14] nfsd: take xattr bits in to account for permission checks Frank van der Linden
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 08/14] nfsd: add structure definitions for xattr requests / responses Frank van der Linden
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 09/14] nfsd: use kvmalloc in svcxdr_tmpalloc Frank van der Linden
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 10/14] nfsd: implement the xattr procedure functions Frank van der Linden
2020-03-12 10:28   ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-12 16:24   ` Chuck Lever
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 11/14] nfsd: add user xattr RPC XDR encoding/decoding logic Frank van der Linden
2020-03-12 13:28   ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-12 16:24   ` Chuck Lever
2020-03-19 22:13     ` Frank van der Linden
2020-03-19 22:15       ` Chuck Lever
2020-03-25 23:44     ` Frank van der Linden
2020-03-26 14:12       ` Chuck Lever
2020-03-12 19:16   ` Chuck Lever
2020-03-20 16:47     ` Frank van der Linden
2020-03-20 17:34       ` Chuck Lever
2020-03-20 17:54         ` J. Bruce Fields
2020-03-20 19:44         ` Frank van der Linden
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 12/14] nfsd: add xattr operations to ops array Frank van der Linden
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 13/14] xattr: add a function to check if a namespace is supported Frank van der Linden
2020-03-12 16:24   ` Chuck Lever
2020-03-11 19:59 ` [PATCH 14/14] nfsd: add fattr support for user extended attributes Frank van der Linden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202003121557.ixk2m2K3%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=fllinden@amazon.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox