From: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
"schumakeranna@gmail.com" <schumakeranna@gmail.com>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix NULL deference in nfs4_get_valid_delegation
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 13:39:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200511173931.GH8629@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200511173723.3xlqhkmrjbuc5g7r@gabell>
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:37:23PM -0400, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How about adding Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org in the sign-off area?
> 9ae075fdd190 "NFSv4: Convert open state lookup to use RCU" was merged
Makes sense to me. I'll leave it to Trond.--b.
> to v4.20 and some stable tree have 9ae075fdd190.
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:02:48AM -0400, bfields@fieldses.org wrote:
> > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
> >
> > We add the new state to the nfsi->open_states list, making it
> > potentially visible to other threads, before we've finished initializing
> > it.
> >
> > That wasn't a problem when all the readers were also taking the i_lock
> > (as we do here), but since we switched to RCU, there's now a possibility
> > that a reader could see the partially initialized state.
> >
> > Symptoms observed were a crash when another thread called
> > nfs4_get_valid_delegation() on a NULL inode, resulting in an oops like:
> >
> > BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffffffffb0 ...
> > RIP: 0010:nfs4_get_valid_delegation+0x6/0x30 [nfsv4] ...
> > Call Trace:
> > nfs4_open_prepare+0x80/0x1c0 [nfsv4]
> > __rpc_execute+0x75/0x390 [sunrpc]
> > ? finish_task_switch+0x75/0x260
> > rpc_async_schedule+0x29/0x40 [sunrpc]
> > process_one_work+0x1ad/0x370
> > worker_thread+0x30/0x390
> > ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
> > kthread+0x10c/0x130
> > ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
> > ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> >
> > Fixes: 9ae075fdd190 "NFSv4: Convert open state lookup to use RCU"
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.20.x-
>
> Thanks!
> Masa
>
> > Reviewed-by: Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikarashi@fujitsu.com>
> > Tested-by: Daisuke Matsuda <matsuda-daisuke@fujitsu.com>
> > Tested-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > > I do have a patch including the tags and oops provided by Masayoshi
> > > Mizuma, if you'd like to take that instead. See followup.--b.
> >
> > Here you go.
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> > index f7723d221945..459c7fb5d103 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -734,9 +734,9 @@ nfs4_get_open_state(struct inode *inode, struct nfs4_state_owner *owner)
> > state = new;
> > state->owner = owner;
> > atomic_inc(&owner->so_count);
> > - list_add_rcu(&state->inode_states, &nfsi->open_states);
> > ihold(inode);
> > state->inode = inode;
> > + list_add_rcu(&state->inode_states, &nfsi->open_states);
> > spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> > /* Note: The reclaim code dictates that we add stateless
> > * and read-only stateids to the end of the list */
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-11 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-08 22:19 [PATCH] nfs: fix NULL deference in nfs4_get_valid_delegation J. Bruce Fields
2020-05-11 12:10 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2020-05-11 13:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2020-05-11 13:43 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-05-11 13:57 ` bfields
2020-05-11 14:01 ` bfields
2020-05-11 14:02 ` bfields
2020-05-11 17:37 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2020-05-11 17:39 ` bfields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200511173931.GH8629@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=schumakeranna@gmail.com \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox