From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: anna.schumaker@netapp.com, trondmy@hammerspace.com
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 02/15] SUNRPC: receive buffer size estimation values almost never change
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:13:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512211301.3288.78856.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512210724.3288.15187.stgit@manet.1015granger.net>
Avoid unnecessary cache sloshing by placing the buffer size
estimation update logic behind an atomic bit flag.
The size of GSS information included in each wrapped Reply does
not change during the lifetime of a GSS context. Therefore, the
au_rslack and au_ralign fields need to be updated only once after
establishing a fresh GSS credential.
Thus a slack size update must occur after a cred is created,
duplicated, renewed, or expires. I'm not sure I have this exactly
right. A trace point is introduced to track updates to these
variables to enable troubleshooting the problem if I missed a spot.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h | 5 +++--
include/trace/events/rpcgss.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h
index 4f6b28487f28..98da816b5fc2 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ struct rpc_auth {
unsigned int au_verfsize; /* size of reply verifier */
unsigned int au_ralign; /* words before UL header */
- unsigned int au_flags;
+ unsigned long au_flags;
const struct rpc_authops *au_ops;
rpc_authflavor_t au_flavor; /* pseudoflavor (note may
* differ from the flavor in
@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ struct rpc_auth {
};
/* rpc_auth au_flags */
-#define RPCAUTH_AUTH_DATATOUCH 0x00000002
+#define RPCAUTH_AUTH_DATATOUCH (1)
+#define RPCAUTH_AUTH_UPDATE_SLACK (2)
struct rpc_auth_create_args {
rpc_authflavor_t pseudoflavor;
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rpcgss.h b/include/trace/events/rpcgss.h
index 32d88c4fb063..421b14db87ae 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rpcgss.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rpcgss.h
@@ -291,6 +291,40 @@
__entry->ret ? "" : "un")
);
+TRACE_EVENT(rpcgss_update_slack,
+ TP_PROTO(
+ const struct rpc_task *task,
+ const struct rpc_auth *auth
+ ),
+
+ TP_ARGS(task, auth),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(unsigned int, task_id)
+ __field(unsigned int, client_id)
+ __field(u32, xid)
+ __field(const void *, auth)
+ __field(unsigned int, rslack)
+ __field(unsigned int, ralign)
+ __field(unsigned int, verfsize)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->task_id = task->tk_pid;
+ __entry->client_id = task->tk_client->cl_clid;
+ __entry->xid = be32_to_cpu(task->tk_rqstp->rq_xid);
+ __entry->auth = auth;
+ __entry->rslack = auth->au_rslack;
+ __entry->ralign = auth->au_ralign;
+ __entry->verfsize = auth->au_verfsize;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("task:%u@%u xid=0x%08x auth=%p rslack=%u ralign=%u verfsize=%u\n",
+ __entry->task_id, __entry->client_id, __entry->xid,
+ __entry->auth, __entry->rslack, __entry->ralign,
+ __entry->verfsize)
+);
+
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(rpcgss_svc_seqno_class,
TP_PROTO(
__be32 xid,
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
index ac5cac0dd24b..5f097c8cacd1 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
@@ -1054,11 +1054,11 @@ static void gss_pipe_free(struct gss_pipe *p)
auth->au_rslack = GSS_KRB5_MAX_SLACK_NEEDED >> 2;
auth->au_verfsize = GSS_VERF_SLACK >> 2;
auth->au_ralign = GSS_VERF_SLACK >> 2;
- auth->au_flags = 0;
+ __set_bit(RPCAUTH_AUTH_UPDATE_SLACK, &auth->au_flags);
auth->au_ops = &authgss_ops;
auth->au_flavor = flavor;
if (gss_pseudoflavor_to_datatouch(gss_auth->mech, flavor))
- auth->au_flags |= RPCAUTH_AUTH_DATATOUCH;
+ __set_bit(RPCAUTH_AUTH_DATATOUCH, &auth->au_flags);
refcount_set(&auth->au_count, 1);
kref_init(&gss_auth->kref);
@@ -1613,6 +1613,7 @@ static int gss_renew_cred(struct rpc_task *task)
new = gss_lookup_cred(auth, &acred, RPCAUTH_LOOKUP_NEW);
if (IS_ERR(new))
return PTR_ERR(new);
+
task->tk_rqstp->rq_cred = new;
put_rpccred(oldcred);
return 0;
@@ -1709,7 +1710,8 @@ static int gss_cred_is_negative_entry(struct rpc_cred *cred)
/* We leave it to unwrap to calculate au_rslack. For now we just
* calculate the length of the verifier: */
- cred->cr_auth->au_verfsize = XDR_QUADLEN(len) + 2;
+ if (test_bit(RPCAUTH_AUTH_UPDATE_SLACK, &cred->cr_auth->au_flags))
+ cred->cr_auth->au_verfsize = XDR_QUADLEN(len) + 2;
status = 0;
out:
gss_put_ctx(ctx);
@@ -1927,13 +1929,30 @@ static int gss_wrap_req(struct rpc_task *task, struct xdr_stream *xdr)
return status;
}
-static int
-gss_unwrap_resp_auth(struct rpc_cred *cred)
+/**
+ * gss_update_rslack - Possibly update RPC receive buffer size estimates
+ * @task: rpc_task for incoming RPC Reply being unwrapped
+ * @cred: controlling rpc_cred for @task
+ * @before: XDR words needed before each RPC Reply message
+ * @after: XDR words needed following each RPC Reply message
+ *
+ */
+static void gss_update_rslack(struct rpc_task *task, struct rpc_cred *cred,
+ unsigned int before, unsigned int after)
{
struct rpc_auth *auth = cred->cr_auth;
- auth->au_rslack = auth->au_verfsize;
- auth->au_ralign = auth->au_verfsize;
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(RPCAUTH_AUTH_UPDATE_SLACK, &auth->au_flags)) {
+ auth->au_ralign = auth->au_verfsize + before;
+ auth->au_rslack = auth->au_verfsize + after;
+ trace_rpcgss_update_slack(task, auth);
+ }
+}
+
+static int
+gss_unwrap_resp_auth(struct rpc_task *task, struct rpc_cred *cred)
+{
+ gss_update_rslack(task, cred, 0, 0);
return 0;
}
@@ -1956,7 +1975,6 @@ static int gss_wrap_req(struct rpc_task *task, struct xdr_stream *xdr)
struct xdr_stream *xdr)
{
struct xdr_buf gss_data, *rcv_buf = &rqstp->rq_rcv_buf;
- struct rpc_auth *auth = cred->cr_auth;
u32 len, offset, seqno, maj_stat;
struct xdr_netobj mic;
int ret;
@@ -2005,8 +2023,7 @@ static int gss_wrap_req(struct rpc_task *task, struct xdr_stream *xdr)
if (maj_stat != GSS_S_COMPLETE)
goto bad_mic;
- auth->au_rslack = auth->au_verfsize + 2 + 1 + XDR_QUADLEN(mic.len);
- auth->au_ralign = auth->au_verfsize + 2;
+ gss_update_rslack(task, cred, 2, 2 + 1 + XDR_QUADLEN(mic.len));
ret = 0;
out:
@@ -2031,7 +2048,6 @@ static int gss_wrap_req(struct rpc_task *task, struct xdr_stream *xdr)
{
struct xdr_buf *rcv_buf = &rqstp->rq_rcv_buf;
struct kvec *head = rqstp->rq_rcv_buf.head;
- struct rpc_auth *auth = cred->cr_auth;
u32 offset, opaque_len, maj_stat;
__be32 *p;
@@ -2058,8 +2074,8 @@ static int gss_wrap_req(struct rpc_task *task, struct xdr_stream *xdr)
*/
xdr_init_decode(xdr, rcv_buf, p, rqstp);
- auth->au_rslack = auth->au_verfsize + 2 + ctx->gc_gss_ctx->slack;
- auth->au_ralign = auth->au_verfsize + 2 + ctx->gc_gss_ctx->align;
+ gss_update_rslack(task, cred, 2 + ctx->gc_gss_ctx->align,
+ 2 + ctx->gc_gss_ctx->slack);
return 0;
unwrap_failed:
@@ -2130,7 +2146,7 @@ static int gss_wrap_req(struct rpc_task *task, struct xdr_stream *xdr)
goto out_decode;
switch (gss_cred->gc_service) {
case RPC_GSS_SVC_NONE:
- status = gss_unwrap_resp_auth(cred);
+ status = gss_unwrap_resp_auth(task, cred);
break;
case RPC_GSS_SVC_INTEGRITY:
status = gss_unwrap_resp_integ(task, cred, ctx, rqstp, xdr);
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
index 3c627dc685cc..2081c8fbfa48 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
@@ -892,8 +892,8 @@ inline int rpcrdma_prepare_send_sges(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt,
* or privacy, direct data placement of individual data items
* is not allowed.
*/
- ddp_allowed = !(rqst->rq_cred->cr_auth->au_flags &
- RPCAUTH_AUTH_DATATOUCH);
+ ddp_allowed = !test_bit(RPCAUTH_AUTH_DATATOUCH,
+ &rqst->rq_cred->cr_auth->au_flags);
/*
* Chunks needed for results?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-12 21:12 [PATCH v1 00/15] Possible patches for v5.8 Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:12 ` [PATCH v1 01/15] SUNRPC: Signalled ASYNC tasks need to exit Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:13 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2020-05-12 21:13 ` [PATCH v1 03/15] SUNRPC: Trace GSS context lifetimes Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:13 ` [PATCH v1 04/15] SUNRPC: Update the rpc_show_task_flags() macro Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:13 ` [PATCH v1 05/15] SUNRPC: Update the RPC_SHOW_SOCKET() macro Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:13 ` [PATCH v1 06/15] SUNRPC: Add tracepoint to rpc_call_rpcerror() Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:13 ` [PATCH v1 07/15] SUNRPC: Split the xdr_buf event class Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:13 ` [PATCH v1 08/15] SUNRPC: Trace transport lifetime events Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:13 ` [PATCH v1 09/15] SUNRPC: trace RPC client " Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:13 ` [PATCH v1 10/15] SUNRPC: rpc_call_null_helper() already sets RPC_TASK_NULLCREDS Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:13 ` [PATCH v1 11/15] SUNRPC: rpc_call_null_helper() should set RPC_TASK_SOFT Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:13 ` [PATCH v1 12/15] SUNRPC: Set SOFTCONN when destroying GSS contexts Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:14 ` [PATCH v1 13/15] NFS: nfs_xdr_status should record the procedure name Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:14 ` [PATCH v1 14/15] NFS: Trace short NFS READs Chuck Lever
2020-05-12 21:14 ` [PATCH v1 15/15] NFS: Add a tracepoint in nfs_set_pgio_error() Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200512211301.3288.78856.stgit@manet.1015granger.net \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox