From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC077C4363A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A8221D42 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1780688AbgJZNvk (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:51:40 -0400 Received: from etc.inittab.org ([51.254.149.154]:54160 "EHLO etc.inittab.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1421385AbgJZNvj (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:51:39 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 558 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:51:38 EDT Received: from var.inittab.org (249.171.116.91.static.reverse-mundo-r.com [91.116.171.249]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: smtp_auth_agi@correo-e.org) by etc.inittab.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74FBAA10BA; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:42:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by var.inittab.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9B6A3404E9; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:42:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:42:16 +0100 From: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Miguel Rodriguez , Isaac Marco Blancas Subject: Re: Random IO errors on nfs clients running linux > 4.20 Message-ID: <20201026134216.GK74269@var.inittab.org> References: <20200429171527.GG2531021@var.inittab.org> <20200430173200.GE29491@fieldses.org> <20200909092900.GO189595@var.inittab.org> <20200909134727.GA3894@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200909134727.GA3894@fieldses.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 09:47:27AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:29:00AM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 01:32:00PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 07:15:27PM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > > > > We can run the previous "ls -lR" 20 times and get no error, or get > > > > this "ls: leyendo el directorio 'Becas y ayudas/': Error de entrada/salida" > > > > (ls: reading directorio 'Becas y ayudas/': Input/Output Error") every > > > > now and then. > > > > > > > > The error happens (obviously?) with ls, rsync and the users's GUI tools. > > > > > > > > There's nothing in dmesg (or elsewhere). > > > > These are the kernels with tried: > > > > 4.18.0-25 -> Can't reproduce > > > > 4.19.0 -> Can't reproduce > > > > 4.20.17 -> Happening (hard to reproduce) > > > > 5.0.0-15 -> Happening (hard to reproduce) > > > > 5.3.0-45 -> Happening (more frequently) > > > > 5.6.0-rc7 -> Reproduced a couple of times after boot, then nothing > > > > > > > > We did long (as in daylong) testing trying to reproduce this with all > > > > those kernel versions, so we are pretty sure 4.18 and 4.19 don't > > > > experience this and our Ubuntu 16.04 clients don't have any issue. > > > > > > > > I know we aren't providing much info but we are really looking forward > > > > to doing all the testing required (we already spent lots of time in it). > > > > > > > > Thanks for your work. > > So all I notice from this one is the readdir EIO came from call_decode. > I suspect that means it failed in the xdr decoding. Looks like xdr > decoding of the actual directory data (which is the complicated part) is > done later, so this means it failed decoding the header or verifier, > which is a little odd: > > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016276] RPC: 3284 call_decode result -5 > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016281] nfs41_sequence_process: Error 1 free the slot > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016286] RPC: wake_up_first(00000000d3f50f4d "ForeChannel Slot table") > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016288] nfs4_free_slot: slotid 0 highest_used_slotid 4294967295 > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016290] RPC: 3284 return 0, status -5 > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016291] RPC: 3284 release task > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016295] RPC: freeing buffer of size 4144 at 00000000a3649daf > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016298] RPC: 3284 release request 0000000079df89b2 > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016300] RPC: wake_up_first(00000000c5ee49ee "xprt_backlog") > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016302] RPC: rpc_release_client(00000000b930c343) > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016304] RPC: 3284 freeing task > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016309] _nfs4_proc_readdir: returns -5 > > Sep 8 16:03:23 portatil264 kernel: [15033.016318] NFS: readdir(departamentos/innovacion) returns -5 Hi, Bruce et al. Is there anything we can do to help debugging/fixing this? It's still biting our users with a +4.20.x kernel. Thanks, Alberto -- Alberto González Iniesta | Universidad a Distancia alberto.gonzalez@udima.es | de Madrid