From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D99C388F7 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 20:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39A520719 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 20:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fieldses.org header.i=@fieldses.org header.b="PVn1aKXd" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732235AbgKEUwI (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:52:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48228 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729783AbgKEUwH (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:52:07 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:2f7::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E278C0613D2 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:52:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 7A2461509; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:52:05 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fieldses.org 7A2461509 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fieldses.org; s=default; t=1604609525; bh=tZbdz25Jh3tUk79L85NkD6dh3U0qvw857r06NkSeLec=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PVn1aKXdsSR6/jIxbA1A0L3nhf2dscXPl9gGGBoHGpkO+Hkv9LLrbUzCxnOBDTegL 8qlpVVSUoJDPvEuTFXG3BvpPh26SBcEUJre5j2TqJqkIg89K0T5bBuzySK/G67CZd1 4V4epvytl6xE/r4afm61d7VdgzAFJa+azmd1uRIY= Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:52:05 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Anna Schumaker Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List Subject: Re: xfstests generic/263 Message-ID: <20201105205205.GC25512@fieldses.org> References: <20201027174945.GC1644@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:59:56PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 1:49 PM J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > Generic/263 is failing whenever client and server both supports > > READ_PLUS. > > > > I'm not even sure the failure is wrong. The NFS FALLOC operation doesn't > > support those other other fallocate modes, are they implemented elsewhere in > > the kernel or libc somehow? Anyway, odd that it would have anything to do with > > READ_PLUS. > > I just ran xfstests, and I'm seeing this too. The test passes using > basic READ on v4.2, so there might be something farther down the log > that diff is cutting off. I'll see if anything sticks out to me this > week. I think 091 is failing from the same cause, by the way. I haven't investigated any more though. --b.