From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F19BC5519F for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6AA20857 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="You0wdb5" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729148AbgKYO40 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:56:26 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:47594 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726039AbgKYO40 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:56:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606316185; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ie2mZVXv8VIoKm02HljM+p1latB4kaiVCyIytKOs7ao=; b=You0wdb5OMnlZqGftjrotoykJXbQG/w79H/B+z2YL3uPuAuN+GzGUkp81Tjm7nZJEKqkki uxYuYTin+FsxrRDzhUu3zEPSBhwY0UtmDTYWW/ZQyOO1sSMDOV5nIQdFBia5gRNnMJ7Gy6 SRZuQhwdD7xxBu1f7XySW7/138IBXSM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-399-waI8F4pfN9epfnL65abOKA-1; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:56:19 -0500 X-MC-Unique: waI8F4pfN9epfnL65abOKA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9C22107ACE3; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pick.fieldses.org (ovpn-112-146.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.146]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAF8D19D61; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pick.fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id CA62E120304; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:56:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:56:17 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Chuck Lever Cc: Jeff Layton , Linux NFS Mailing List Subject: Re: NFSD merge candidate for v5.11 Message-ID: <20201125145617.GA77389@pick.fieldses.org> References: <48FA73BE-2D86-4A3F-91D5-C1086E228938@oracle.com> <0cbeed0a0fa2352961966efdd7e62247b5cd7a7b.camel@redhat.com> <5A43C026-0746-4F62-8298-2501EF1EF692@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5A43C026-0746-4F62-8298-2501EF1EF692@oracle.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:36:21PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > > > > On Nov 24, 2020, at 6:14 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 17:51 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > >> Hi- > >> > >> I've added my NFSv4 XDR decoder series and Bruce's iversion > >> series to my "for next" topic branch to get some early > >> testing exposure for these changes. > >> > >> Bruce's series is based on 8/8 posted on November 20, with > >> Jeff's review comments integrated. The NFSD XDR decoder > >> patches are based on v4, posted yesterday afternoon with > >> Bruce's review comments integrated. > >> > >> The full branch is available here: > >> > >> git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/cel/cel-2.6.git cel-next > >> > >> or > >> > >> http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=cel/cel-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/cel-next > >> > >> ...and is still open for changes or additional patches. This > >> branch is pulled into linux-next regularly. > > > > Minor nit in: > > > > http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=cel/cel-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2513716015eba398378bf453d5d2dd46c63a3399 > > > > You added a generic_check_iversion prototype to fs.h. > > > > Move that into iversion.h. I think it makes more sense there, and that > > avoids the huge rebuild that occurs when fs.h changes. > > Declarations for most other generic_* functions are in fs.h. > But OK, moved, and the series pushed. > > So I think the btrfs/ext4/xfs-specific changes might need > sign-off by those maintainers. And nfs, I think that's the one I'm mostly likely to have messed up, actually.... > Should I post this series to linux-fsdevel? Or, Bruce, do you want to? I think I should do it. --b.