From: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"bfields@redhat.com" <bfields@redhat.com>,
"chuck.lever@oracle.com" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: Record NFSv4 pre/post-op attributes as non-atomic
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 16:14:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201201211404.GE21355@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34503d767cffb6b8ffc94dc80ae7632d38a7d68f.camel@hammerspace.com>
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 08:59:00PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 15:53 -0500, bfields@fieldses.org wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 08:27:38PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > As far as I can tell, there is no need for it at all, since both
> > > the
> > > NFSv3 and NFSv4 client can supply atomic struct change_info4 in the
> > > cases where it is relevant (those cases being recording the changes
> > > to
> > > the parent directory/ies when doing CREATE, OPEN(O_CREAT), LINK,
> > > REMOVE
> > > and RENAME).
> >
> > I was wondering about that. We'd need some additional interface to
> > allow nfs to supply that stuff to nfsd, right?
>
> The only problem is the pre-op attributes, since those are supplied by
> the server but never recorded anywhere. Otherwise, all you really need
> is to hold the inode lock on the directory to prevent the client from
> making updates after the operation is done.
We already have the lock over all those operations.
I was worried that wouldn't prevent a getattr in another thread from
updating the change attribute. Is that not possible?
My only idea for returning extra information was a hack using
kthread_data() as we're doing in nfsd_breaker_owns_lease(); nfs would
call something like:
void nfsd_set_cinfo(struct nfs4_change_info *cinfo)
{
struct svc_rqst *rqst;
if (!i_am_nfsd())
return;
rqst = kthread_data(current);
rqst->cinfo = cinfo;
}
Then nfsd fetches it afterwards. Maybe there's a better way.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-01 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 4:14 [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: Avoid /* Fallthrough */ trondmy
2020-12-01 4:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: Record NFSv4 pre/post-op attributes as non-atomic trondmy
2020-12-01 16:10 ` Chuck Lever
2020-12-01 19:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2020-12-01 20:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-12-01 20:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-12-01 20:53 ` bfields
2020-12-01 20:59 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-12-01 21:14 ` bfields [this message]
2020-12-01 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: Avoid /* Fallthrough */ Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201201211404.GE21355@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).