From: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: helper for laundromat expiry calculations
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:55:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210303215515.GF3949@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AC0F5679-8B32-4D75-B28B-67171027B70D@oracle.com>
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:35:18PM +0000, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 2, 2021, at 10:46 AM, Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
> >
> > We do this same logic repeatedly, and it's easy to get the sense of the
> > comparison wrong.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > My original version of this patch... actually got the sense of the
> > comparison wrong!
> >
> > Now actually tested.
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index 61552e89bd89..8e6938902b49 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -5363,6 +5363,22 @@ static bool clients_still_reclaiming(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +struct laundry_time {
> > + time64_t cutoff;
> > + time64_t new_timeo;
> > +};
> > +
> > +bool state_expired(struct laundry_time *lt, time64_t last_refresh)
> > +{
> > + time64_t time_remaining;
> > +
> > + if (last_refresh < lt->cutoff)
> > + return true;
> > + time_remaining = last_refresh - lt->cutoff;
> > + lt->new_timeo = min(lt->new_timeo, time_remaining);
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
>
> /home/cel/src/linux/linux/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:5371:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘state_expired’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 5371 | bool state_expired(struct laundry_time *lt, time64_t last_refresh)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Should this new helper be static, or instead perhaps these items
> should be defined in a header file.
Whoops, should have been static, yes, do you want to fix it up or should
I resend?
--b.
>
> > static time64_t
> > nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > {
> > @@ -5372,14 +5388,16 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp;
> > struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl;
> > struct list_head *pos, *next, reaplist;
> > - time64_t cutoff = ktime_get_boottime_seconds() - nn->nfsd4_lease;
> > - time64_t t, new_timeo = nn->nfsd4_lease;
> > + struct laundry_time lt = {
> > + .cutoff = ktime_get_boottime_seconds() - nn->nfsd4_lease,
> > + .new_timeo = nn->nfsd4_lease
> > + };
> > struct nfs4_cpntf_state *cps;
> > copy_stateid_t *cps_t;
> > int i;
> >
> > if (clients_still_reclaiming(nn)) {
> > - new_timeo = 0;
> > + lt.new_timeo = 0;
> > goto out;
> > }
> > nfsd4_end_grace(nn);
> > @@ -5389,7 +5407,7 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > idr_for_each_entry(&nn->s2s_cp_stateids, cps_t, i) {
> > cps = container_of(cps_t, struct nfs4_cpntf_state, cp_stateid);
> > if (cps->cp_stateid.sc_type == NFS4_COPYNOTIFY_STID &&
> > - cps->cpntf_time < cutoff)
> > + state_expired(<, cps->cpntf_time))
> > _free_cpntf_state_locked(nn, cps);
> > }
> > spin_unlock(&nn->s2s_cp_lock);
> > @@ -5397,11 +5415,8 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
> > list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &nn->client_lru) {
> > clp = list_entry(pos, struct nfs4_client, cl_lru);
> > - if (clp->cl_time > cutoff) {
> > - t = clp->cl_time - cutoff;
> > - new_timeo = min(new_timeo, t);
> > + if (!state_expired(<, clp->cl_time))
> > break;
> > - }
> > if (mark_client_expired_locked(clp)) {
> > trace_nfsd_clid_expired(&clp->cl_clientid);
> > continue;
> > @@ -5418,11 +5433,8 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > spin_lock(&state_lock);
> > list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &nn->del_recall_lru) {
> > dp = list_entry (pos, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
> > - if (dp->dl_time > cutoff) {
> > - t = dp->dl_time - cutoff;
> > - new_timeo = min(new_timeo, t);
> > + if (!state_expired(<, dp->dl_time))
> > break;
> > - }
> > WARN_ON(!unhash_delegation_locked(dp));
> > list_add(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &reaplist);
> > }
> > @@ -5438,11 +5450,8 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > while (!list_empty(&nn->close_lru)) {
> > oo = list_first_entry(&nn->close_lru, struct nfs4_openowner,
> > oo_close_lru);
> > - if (oo->oo_time > cutoff) {
> > - t = oo->oo_time - cutoff;
> > - new_timeo = min(new_timeo, t);
> > + if (!state_expired(<, oo->oo_time))
> > break;
> > - }
> > list_del_init(&oo->oo_close_lru);
> > stp = oo->oo_last_closed_stid;
> > oo->oo_last_closed_stid = NULL;
> > @@ -5468,11 +5477,8 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > while (!list_empty(&nn->blocked_locks_lru)) {
> > nbl = list_first_entry(&nn->blocked_locks_lru,
> > struct nfsd4_blocked_lock, nbl_lru);
> > - if (nbl->nbl_time > cutoff) {
> > - t = nbl->nbl_time - cutoff;
> > - new_timeo = min(new_timeo, t);
> > + if (!state_expired(<, nbl->nbl_time))
> > break;
> > - }
> > list_move(&nbl->nbl_lru, &reaplist);
> > list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_list);
> > }
> > @@ -5485,8 +5491,7 @@ nfs4_laundromat(struct nfsd_net *nn)
> > free_blocked_lock(nbl);
> > }
> > out:
> > - new_timeo = max_t(time64_t, new_timeo, NFSD_LAUNDROMAT_MINTIMEOUT);
> > - return new_timeo;
> > + return max_t(time64_t, lt.new_timeo, NFSD_LAUNDROMAT_MINTIMEOUT);
> > }
> >
> > static struct workqueue_struct *laundry_wq;
> > --
> > 2.29.2
> >
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-04 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 15:46 [PATCH] nfsd: helper for laundromat expiry calculations Bruce Fields
2021-03-03 15:37 ` Chuck Lever
2021-03-03 21:35 ` Chuck Lever
2021-03-03 21:55 ` Bruce Fields [this message]
2021-03-03 21:59 ` Chuck Lever
2021-03-03 22:01 ` Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210303215515.GF3949@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).