From: trondmy@kernel.org
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 24/26] NFSv4: link must update the inode nlink.
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:43:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414134353.11860-25-trondmy@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414134353.11860-24-trondmy@kernel.org>
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
---
fs/nfs/dir.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
index d2835d211a73..5c25c8cc037a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -1711,7 +1711,7 @@ static void nfs_drop_nlink(struct inode *inode)
NFS_I(inode)->attr_gencount = nfs_inc_attr_generation_counter();
nfs_set_cache_invalid(
inode, NFS_INO_INVALID_CHANGE | NFS_INO_INVALID_CTIME |
- NFS_INO_INVALID_NLINK | NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED);
+ NFS_INO_INVALID_NLINK);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
}
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index d05f4ca5d9c0..2215f20e0e78 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -1175,6 +1175,14 @@ nfs4_inc_nlink_locked(struct inode *inode)
inc_nlink(inode);
}
+static void
+nfs4_inc_nlink(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ nfs4_inc_nlink_locked(inode);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+}
+
static void
nfs4_dec_nlink_locked(struct inode *inode)
{
@@ -4791,6 +4799,7 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_link(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir, const struct
if (!status) {
nfs4_update_changeattr(dir, &res.cinfo, res.fattr->time_start,
NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA);
+ nfs4_inc_nlink(inode);
status = nfs_post_op_update_inode(inode, res.fattr);
if (!status)
nfs_setsecurity(inode, res.fattr, res.label);
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 13:43 [PATCH v2 00/26] Attribute revalidation updates trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/26] NFS: Deal correctly with attribute generation counter overflow trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/26] NFS: Fix up inode cache tracing trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/26] NFS: Mask out unsupported attributes in nfs_getattr() trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/26] NFS: NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE should mark the change attribute invalid trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/26] NFS: Fix up revalidation of space used trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/26] NFS: Don't revalidate attributes that are not being asked for trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/26] NFS: Fix up statx() results trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/26] NFS: nfs_setattr_update_inode() should clear the suid/sgid bits trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/26] NFS: Add a cache validity flag argument to nfs_revalidate_inode() trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 10/26] NFS: Replace use of NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE when checking cache validity trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 11/26] NFS: Don't set NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE in the inode " trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 12/26] NFSv4: Fix nfs4_bitmap_copy_adjust() trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 13/26] NFS: Separate tracking of file nlinks cache validity from the mode/uid/gid trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 14/26] NFS: Separate tracking of file mode cache validity from the uid/gid trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 15/26] NFS: Fix up handling of outstanding layoutcommit in nfs_update_inode() trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 16/26] NFS: Remove a line of code that has no effect " trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 17/26] NFS: Simplify cache consistency in nfs_check_inode_attributes() trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 18/26] NFSv4: Fix value of decode_fsinfo_maxsz trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 19/26] NFSv4: Don't modify the change attribute cached in the inode trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 20/26] NFSv4: Add support for the NFSv4.2 "change_attr_type" attribute trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 21/26] NFS: Use information about the change attribute to optimise updates trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 22/26] NFS: Another inode revalidation improvement trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 23/26] NFSv4: nfs4_inc/dec_nlink_locked should also invalidate ctime trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` trondmy [this message]
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 25/26] NFS: Don't store NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED trondmy
2021-04-14 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 26/26] NFS: Split attribute support out from the server capabilities trondmy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210414134353.11860-25-trondmy@kernel.org \
--to=trondmy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox