From: trondmy@kernel.org
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] NFSv4/pnfs: Fix layoutget behaviour after invalidation
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2021 22:05:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210704020510.4898-2-trondmy@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210704020510.4898-1-trondmy@kernel.org>
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the layout gets invalidated, we should wait for any outstanding
layoutget requests for that layout to complete, and we should resend
them only after re-establishing the layout stateid.
Fixes: d29b468da4f9 ("pNFS/NFSv4: Improve rejection of out-of-order layouts")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index ffe02e43f8c0..be960e47d7f6 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -2014,7 +2014,7 @@ pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino,
* If the layout segment list is empty, but there are outstanding
* layoutget calls, then they might be subject to a layoutrecall.
*/
- if (list_empty(&lo->plh_segs) &&
+ if ((list_empty(&lo->plh_segs) || !pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo)) &&
atomic_read(&lo->plh_outstanding) != 0) {
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
lseg = ERR_PTR(wait_var_event_killable(&lo->plh_outstanding,
@@ -2390,11 +2390,13 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp)
goto out_forget;
}
+ if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo) && !pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo))
+ goto out_forget;
+
if (nfs4_stateid_match_other(&lo->plh_stateid, &res->stateid)) {
/* existing state ID, make sure the sequence number matches. */
if (pnfs_layout_stateid_blocked(lo, &res->stateid)) {
- if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo) &&
- pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo))
+ if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo))
lo->plh_barrier = 0;
dprintk("%s forget reply due to sequence\n", __func__);
goto out_forget;
@@ -2413,8 +2415,6 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp)
goto out_forget;
} else {
/* We have a completely new layout */
- if (!pnfs_is_first_layoutget(lo))
- goto out_forget;
pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &res->stateid, lgp->cred, true);
}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-04 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-04 2:05 [PATCH 1/5] NFSv4/pnfs: Fix the layout barrier update trondmy
2021-07-04 2:05 ` trondmy [this message]
2021-07-04 2:05 ` [PATCH 3/5] NFSv4/pnfs: Clean up layout get on open trondmy
2021-07-04 2:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] NFSv4/pNFS: Don't call _nfs4_pnfs_v3_ds_connect multiple times trondmy
2021-07-04 2:05 ` [PATCH 5/5] NFSv4/pNFS: Return an error if _nfs4_pnfs_v3_ds_connect can't load NFSv3 trondmy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210704020510.4898-2-trondmy@kernel.org \
--to=trondmy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox